Windy City Media Group Frontpage News
Celebrating 30 Years of Gay Lesbian Bisexual and Trans News
home search facebook twitter join
Gay News Sponsor Windy City Times 2016-04-27
DOWNLOAD ISSUE
About WCMG Publications News Index  Entertainment Features Bars & Clubs Calendar Videos Advertisers OUT! Guide    Marriage


  WINDY CITY TIMES

Supreme Court to hear marriage equality cases (UPDATE)
by Lisa Keen, Keen News Service
2012-12-07

facebook twitter google +1 reddit email


In a surprise development, the U.S. Supreme Court announced Dec. 7 that it will review both the Prop 8 case concerning a statewide ban on same-sex marriage and a Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) case concerning a ban on federal recognition of same-sex marriages.

Many observers had predicted the court would hear a case involving DOMA, but many more expected the court to pass on reviewing a lower court decision concerning Prop 8, the California ban on same-sex marriage. Ted Olson and David Boies, the high-profile attorneys who had successfully challenged Prop 8 in the courts below had urged the Supreme Court to deny review of the Ninth Circuit ruling. That ruling, they noted, did "not conflict with any decision of [the Supreme] Court or any other court of appeals."

However, refusing to hear the Yes on 8 attorneys' appeal of the lower court decision would have meant same-sex couples could start obtaining marriage licenses within days, dramatically increasing the population of states allowing same-sex marriage.

And while many expected the court to take one or more cases concerning DOMA, the big question was which case or cases it would review.

The court has chosen to review a Second Circuit case, Windsor v. U.S., in which the surviving spouse is challenging the federal government's refusal to recognize her marriage when it comes to estate taxes on her deceased spouse's estate.

In both cases, the Supreme Court has presented attorneys on both sides with a question on a procedural issue of standing in addition to the original question on merits.

In the Prop 8 case, Hollingsworth v. Perry, the court asks that attorneys argue whether the Yes on 8 supporters of the initiative have legal standing to appeal the lower court's decisions given that the state of California chose not to press an appeal. That means it may be possible the court will let the lower court decision stand by simply ruling that Yes on 8 did not have legal standing to file its appeal. The result would mean the same-sex couples would be able to marry—but the resolution would be delayed until June and be politically less consequential.

The Olson-Boies legal team raised the standing issue after Yes on 8 filed its first appeal to a Ninth Circuit panel. Asked whether the court might use the standing issue as a way out of ruling on the merits, Olson said he thinks the court will "probably get to the merits" of the case but said that, if it doesn't, then the 134-page U.S. district court decision declaring Prop 8 a violation of equal protection would be the prevailing decision in California.

"Everyone is anxious to get to the merits," said Boies, but he acknowledged his legal team has argued that Yes on 8 does not having standing to make their appeal. But ruling that Yes on 8 does not have standing would still allow the citizens of California to enjoy marriage equality, said Boies.

In the DOMA case, the Supreme Court asks attorneys on both sides to argue the Obama administration's agreement with courts below that DOMA is unconstitutional "deprives" the Supreme Court of jurisdiction to decide the case. It also asks whether the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) has standing to appeal the lower court decisions to the Supreme Court.

Ted Olson told reporters on a telephone conference call Friday afternoon that he is "very confident" that the outcome of the case before the U.S. Supreme Court "will be to support the rights of our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters."

"We could not be more gratified that this is the case" on which the Supreme Court may decide "the most important civil rights issue of our time," said Olson.

David Boies was more guarded, saying he was "encouraged and excited about the prospect that we will finally get a decision on the merits."

Asked whether the Obama administration might weigh in on the Prop 8 case at the high court, Olson said "we would certainly hope they would participate…and would support our position…."

The Obama administration has weighed in on the DOMA cases, arguing in court that it believes the core section of the law to be unconstitutional.

Arguments in both cases are likely to be scheduled for the second half of March.

The high court did not indicate Friday whether it would hear an appeal from Arizona, seeking to preserve a state law that bars gay state employees from receiving health benefits for their domestic partners the same as straight state employees are able to obtain for their spouses. Some indication of that, as well as denying review on several other DOMA cases, could be issued on the Dec. 10 routine-orders list.

One of the Prop 8 plaintiffs, Kris Perry, said "we have learned how to be patient" and that, while she would like to be getting married next week, she is hopeful that, by hearing the Prop 8 case, the court might rule in a way that will make same-sex marriage possible for many others.

©2012 Keen News Service. All rights reserved.


facebook twitter google +1 reddit email




Windy City Media Group does not approve or necessarily agree with the views posted below.
Please do not post letters to the editor here. Please also be civil in your dialogue.
If you need to be mean, just know that the longer you stay on this page, the more you help us.


  ARTICLES YOU MIGHT LIKE

NCAA Says Future Final Four Host Cities Must Have LGBT Inclusive Non-Bias Laws 2016-04-28
Kitty Genovese's murderer dies in prison 2016-04-27
Coalition aims for Servin firing, CSU funding 2016-04-27
Auto news: lawsuits, recalls and more 2016-04-26
250+ Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence Groups Condemn Anti-Trans Laws 2016-04-21
Report: LGBT elected officials key to blocking anti-LGBT laws 2016-04-20
Pro-LGBT organizations criticize N.C. order 2016-04-20
Report: N.C. law could cost state $567M 2016-04-20
S.C. sheriff makes anti-trans speech 2016-04-20
Task force releases scathing CPD report 2016-04-20
Rauner meets with trans-bill advocates 2016-04-20
National roundup: Task Force's call, N.C. law, Hillary and AIDS activists 2016-04-19
Ethiopian Israeli activists to speak April 25 2016-04-16
Rauner meets with trans-bill advocates 2016-04-16
NCTE condemns South Carolina Sheriff Wright for threatening trans women 2016-04-15
Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, Labor: Country Reports on Human Rights Practices 2016-04-15
LGBT adults nearly twice as likely to encounter cyber bullying 2016-04-14
HRC, Equality North Carolina ask Gov. McCrory, legislative leaders for H.B. 2 records 2016-04-14
Cook County Board votes to boycott N.C. and Miss. 2016-04-13
Task Force calls for sweeping change in Chicago policing 2016-04-13
First Circuit removes district judge in marriage case 2016-04-13
Fire Department pioneer reflects on making history 2016-04-13
World: Swedish stamp, Saudi Arabia report, marriage allowed in Norway, Colombia 2016-04-12
ASK LAMBDA LEGAL Day of Silence 2016-04-12
Pediatricians, health professionals speak against legislation targeting trans youth 2016-04-12
GLAAD calls on music industry to push against anti-GLBT Tennessee bills 2016-04-12
Entertainment industry leaders urging legislators to halt anti-LGBT bills 2016-04-12
Arroyo, Preckwinkle propose bans on doing business with North Carolina, Mississippi 2016-04-11
Director of IL ACLU's police project comments on reports of police spying 2016-04-10
Oldham sentenced to six months in jail 2016-04-09
Prosecutors confirm Hastert abuse allegations 2016-04-09
Transgender Americans talk Hillary Clinton 2016-04-08
Bruce Springsteen cancels North Carolina concert over extreme anti-LGBT law 2016-04-08
1st Circuit removes judge, reaffirms ban's unconstitutionality in Puerto Rico marriage 2016-04-07
Lambda Legal issues FAQ for LGBT community in Mississippi 2016-04-07
130+ CEOs, business leaders urging lawmakers to repeal anti-LGBT North Carolina Law 2016-04-07
FL Department of Children and Families to remove LGBTQ-inclusive language from rules 2016-04-07
Tennessee House Committee advances legislative assault on transgender students 2016-04-06
Miss. Gov. signs anti-LGBT discrimination into law 2016-04-05
TLDEF responds to guilty plea in killing of Islan Nettles 2016-04-05
 



Copyright © 2016 Windy City Media Group. All rights reserved.
Reprint by permission only. PDFs for back issues are downloadable from
our online archives. Single copies of back issues in print form are
available for $4 per issue, older than one month for $6 if available,
by check to the mailing address listed below.

Return postage must accompany all manuscripts, drawings, and
photographs submitted if they are to be returned, and no
responsibility may be assumed for unsolicited materials.
All rights to letters, art and photos sent to Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago
Gay and Lesbian News and Feature Publication) will be treated
as unconditionally assigned for publication purposes and as such,
subject to editing and comment. The opinions expressed by the
columnists, cartoonists, letter writers, and commentators are
their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual and Transegender News and Feature Publication).

The appearance of a name, image or photo of a person or group in
Nightspots (Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times
(a Chicago Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature
Publication) does not indicate the sexual orientation of such
individuals or groups. While we encourage readers to support the
advertisers who make this newspaper possible, Nightspots (Chicago
GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay, Lesbian
News and Feature Publication) cannot accept responsibility for
any advertising claims or promotions.

 

 

 

TRENDINGBREAKINGPHOTOS

Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor


 



Sponsor

About WCMG Publications News Index  Entertainment Features Bars & Clubs Calendar Videos Advertisers OUT! Guide    Marriage



About WCMG      Contact Us      Online Front  Page      Windy City  Times      Nightspots      OUT! Guide     
Identity      BLACKlines      En La Vida      Archives      Subscriptions      Distribution      Windy City Queercast     
Queercast Archives      Advertising  Rates      Deadlines      Advanced Search     
Press  Releases      Event Photos      Join WCMG  Email List      Email Blast     
Upcoming Events      Todays Events      Ongoing Events      Post an Event      Bar Guide      Community Groups      In Memoriam      Outguide Categories      Outguide Advertisers      Search Outguide      Travel      Dining Out      Blogs      Spotlight  Video     
Classifieds      Real Estate      Place a  Classified     

Windy City Media Group produces Windy City Queercast, & publishes Windy City Times,
The Weekly Voice of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Trans Community,
Nightspots, Out! Resource Guide, and Identity.
5315 N. Clark St. #192, Chicago, IL 60640-2113 • PH (773) 871-7610 • FAX (773) 871-7609.