Windy City Media Group Frontpage News Home
CELEBRATING 28+ YEARS OF Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender NEWS

Search Gay News Articles
Advanced Search
Gay News Sponsor Windy City Times 2014-08-27
Download Issue
  News Index       Archives   About WCMG    Publications    Bars & Clubs     Calendar   Videos   Advertisers    OUT! Guide    Classifieds   AIDS @ 32
 Local | National | World | Politics | Obits | Profiles | Views | Entertainment | Theater | Dance | Music | Film | Art | Books | TV/Gossip
 Travel | History | Marriage | Youth | Trans | Lesbian | Celebrations | Food | Nightlife | Sports | Health | Real Estate | Autos | Pets | Crime

Knight at the Movies: Love Is Strange; To Be Takei; Yves; film notes Knight at the Movies: Love Is Strange;
To Be Takei; Yves;
film notes
This week in Chicago theaters it's a queer movie trifecta—a rare occasion ...

Browse Gay News Index   Browse Gay News Archives
  Windy City Times

Illinois rep compares same-sex marriage to statutory rape
by Kate Sosin, Windy City Times
2013-04-12

facebook twitter del.icio.us stumble upon digg google +1 reddit email


An Illinois lawmaker is again under fire for alleged anti-gay comments in emails to constituents.

Rep. Tom Morrison (R-54) compared same-sex marriage to statutory rape in an email obtained by Windy City Times to a constituent.

In the email, Morrison asks where the line would be drawn of same-sex couples were allowed to marry.

"If one male and one female is discriminatory, then isn't limitation of marriage to just two people discriminatory, too?" he wrote. "There are men who would like to marry two or more consenting females. Would you define their relationship as marriage, too? Could a man marry a consenting 9-year old girl? Why not? To refuse them would be discrimination. Again, where would you draw the line?

"If you say a man and a 9-year old girl in marriage is absurd, then I would point out that only 20 years ago or so it would have been considered absurd that two men or two women could marry."

Morrison's position against equal marriage has been well-documented. Last July, he was among a group of lawmakers who introduced a bill reaffirming the state's ban on same-sex marriage.

Last month, he took heat for a similar email exchange with a constituent. According to DailyKos.com, Morrison speculated that if equal marriage passed, "bisexual individuals could argue that they ought to be permitted to marry both sexes at the same time."

Morrison said he regretted his latest, which he said were "inappropriate, inflammatory" and "distracting."

"I do not equate same-sex marriage with marriage to nine-year olds," Morrison said. "I don't want anyone in my district to feel like they are slighted or disrespected."

Morrison said he was trying to make a point that laws are based on value judgments. He also said he emailed his constituent a second time in an effort to clarify his stance. That full email is provided below.

Morrison's email:

Dear [Redacted],

I got an email and phone call tonight from Natasha Korecki at the Chicago Sun-Times. She told me that you were upset by the last email I sent you regarding SB10.

I get hundreds if not thousands of emails everyday, and I do my best to read and personally respond to as many as I can. Sometimes in my haste to deliver, words or thoughts do not translate well.

As you're well aware, we do disagree on this issue and likely will continue to disagree. That's OK. I have my strongly felt reasons, and you have yours.

To be clear, however: I do not equate same sex marriage with statutory rape.

The point I was trying to make was this: the state already has certain restrictions on what marriage is. The law itself makes distinctions on who can and cannot marry. For example, one cannot be married to more than one person at the same time. You are not advocating for polyamory (I don't think), but there are those in Illinois who do. Just google Polyamory Chicago, and see for yourself. They argue that the state is discriminating against their sexual orientation, love, desire to commit, freedom, equality, etc.

The state also defines the age at which individuals may marry. There are groups today that believe young girls ought to be able to marry. Check out the following: ( jonathanturley.org/2010/02/26/marriage "Saudi Cleric Defends Marriage of Nine-Year-Old Girls and Blasts Human Rights Treaties as the Work of Atheists and Fornicators"). Yes, I find that shocking, too! Saudi Arabia is not Illinois obviously, but would this Saudi Cleric consider IL's law on marriage to be discriminatory? Probably. I think it's a fair question to ask. By whose standards do we make our laws? I learned to drive a car at age 10. Was the state prejudicial against me in not allowing me to get a license and drive until I was 16? Why not 15? Why not 12? Why not 10?

So how do we as a society deal with differences of opinion and beliefs on important and emotional issues?

We have a democratic process here. The people's elected representatives are deciding whether or not our state's marriage law should be re-defined. Our society is engaged in a healthy debate about that now. You and I can continue to engage in that now, if you wish, either via email, phone call, or in person. In fact, I will be meeting with a Palatine man who is in a same sex civil union later this summer (assuming SB10 still hasn't been decided by then). You and I could also meet individually or as a group to discuss this.

Changing a law like this is not a light matter. Same sex relationships have been around for millenia, obviously, but codifying marriage as a relationship without regard to gender is a shift of enormous proportions. Interracial marriages have been in existence for millenia, too. Though they were temporarily (in the scope of human history) outlawed in certain jurisdictions, the unions were still of man and woman. That's why I don't believe it's appropriate to say SB10 is analogous with interracial marriage laws, by the way.

Just two years ago, in a lame duck session, the legislature passed a civil unions law. You may believe that it was late in coming, or inadequate, or still discriminatory to same sex couples; you and I haven't discussed those details so I don't know. During the debate two years ago, however, the sponsors of the civil unions bill stated that marriage was not their end goal. They also stated that religious individuals and organizations would not be affected if the civil unions law was enacted. We discovered in short order that neither was the case. Same sex marriage is under discussion now, and two large religious-based adoption agencies have had their state contracts cancelled due to religious beliefs. That's why opponents have real concerns about SB10.

Kathleen, I don't seek to intentionally offend or be condescending to anyone, and if I was to you it was unintentional, and I genuinely apologize. If this ever happens again, please do not hesitate to contact my staff or me personally, and I will do my best to respond in a timely manner.

Sincerely,

Tom


facebook twitter del.icio.us stumble upon digg google +1 reddit email




Windy City Media Group does not approve or necessarily
agree with the views posted below.
Please do not post letters to the editor here.
Please also be civil in your dialogue.
If you need to be mean, just know that the longer you
stay on this page, the more you help us.

Utah marriage plaintiffs ask Supreme Court for review 2014-08-28
Indiana, Wisconsin couples rally before marriage hearing 2014-08-27
7th Circuit hears arguments for Indiana, Wisconsin equal marriage 2014-08-26
Couples rally in Chicago on eve of marriage hearing 2014-08-25
Florida marriage ban ruled unconstitutional by Fed Court 2014-08-21
U.S. Supreme Court blocks marriage in Virginia 2014-08-20
Judge: Ind. must recognize out-of-state same-sex marriages 2014-08-20
GayWeddings.com head talks about new book 2014-08-20
CELEBRATIONS: Wojcik-Austin 2014-08-19
Three couples tie the knot in festive fashion 2014-08-19
John Barrowman talks 'Torchwood,' 'Arrow' and marriage equality 2014-08-17
WNBA players Griner, Johnson engaged 2014-08-16
Rally in Chicago on eve of 7th Circuit marriage cases 2014-08-14
Affinity conference takes on post-marriage equality issues 2014-08-13
6th Circuit signal direction on marriage equality lawsuits 2014-08-07
Target supports marriage equality 2014-08-07
Sixth Circuit hears Tennessee marriage equality case 2014-08-06
Federal Appeals Court to hear arguments in six marriage cases 2014-08-06
Wedding announcements 2014-08-06
National: Frank slams Obama; first responders back marriage 2014-08-05
Skateboarding's Tony Hawk joins Americans for Marriage Equality 2014-07-30
6th Circuit Court of Appeals to hear marriage equality cases 2014-07-30
Lambda Legal to 7th Circuit: Grant marriage for all Hoosiers 2014-07-29
Knight and Bailey wed 2014-07-28
4th Circuit Court of Appeals strikes down Virginia ban 2014-07-27
Forde and Zipter wed 2014-07-24
Miami court rules in favor of marriage equality in Florida 2014-07-24
Colorado marriage ban overturned by Federal Court 2014-07-23
Supreme Court grants stay in Utah marriage case 2014-07-18
10th Circuit affirms marriage equality for Oklahomans 2014-07-18
Florida state court rules marriage ban unconstitutional 2014-07-17
Marriage advocate Jordan needs kidney donor 2014-07-14
Ind. governor won't recognize marriage equality 2014-07-09
Colorado marriage ban struck down in state court 2014-07-09
High profile expansion for Rony Tennenbaum Jewelry 2014-07-09
Immigration activists turn to LGBT marriage work for ideas 2014-07-05
Ald. Deb Mell announces marriage ending on Twitter 2014-07-03
Married same-sex couples to receive FMLA benefits 2014-07-02
Republican backs marriage; rulings in CO, UT, KY 2014-07-01
Kentucky marriage ban struck down by federal judge 2014-07-01





Copyright © 2014 Windy City Media Group. All rights reserved.
Reprint by permission only. PDFs for back issues are downloadable from
our online archives. Single copies of back issues in print form are
available for $4 per issue, older than one month for $6 if available,
by check to the mailing address listed below.

Return postage must accompany all manuscripts, drawings, and
photographs submitted if they are to be returned, and no
responsibility may be assumed for unsolicited materials.
All rights to letters, art and photos sent to Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago
Gay and Lesbian News and Feature Publication) will be treated
as unconditionally assigned for publication purposes and as such,
subject to editing and comment. The opinions expressed by the
columnists, cartoonists, letter writers, and commentators are
their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual and Transegender News and Feature Publication).

The appearance of a name, image or photo of a person or group in
Nightspots (Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times
(a Chicago Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature
Publication) does not indicate the sexual orientation of such
individuals or groups. While we encourage readers to support the
advertisers who make this newspaper possible, Nightspots (Chicago
GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay, Lesbian
News and Feature Publication) cannot accept responsibility for
any advertising claims or promotions.

 

 

 



 

Attendees board 'Soul Train' at ALCC event
 
DINING Freshii's Alex Blair on expanding empire
 
Michael Jackson tribute Aug. 28-30 in Gary, Indiana
 
Way-out Wizard World: costumes, characters, artists
 
Before we go moving the Pride Parade...
 
Windy City Times Current DownloadNightspots Current DownloadQueercast Current Download
Windy City Media Group BlogsJoin Our Email List!Donate Now



  News Index       Archives   About WCMG    Publications    Bars & Clubs     Calendar   Videos   Advertisers    OUT! Guide    Classifieds   AIDS @ 32
 Local | National | World | Politics | Obits | Profiles | Views | Entertainment | Theater | Dance | Music | Film | Art | Books | TV/Gossip
 Travel | History | Marriage | Youth | Trans | Lesbian | Celebrations | Food | Nightlife | Sports | Health | Real Estate | Autos | Pets | Crime



About WCMG      Contact Us      Online Front  Page      Windy City  Times      Nightspots      OUT! Guide     
Identity      BLACKlines      En La Vida      Archives      Subscriptions      Distribution      Windy City Queercast     
Queercast Archives      Advertising  Rates      Deadlines      Advanced Search     
Press  Releases      Event Photos      Join WCMG  Email List      Email Blast     
Upcoming Events      Todays Events      Ongoing Events      Post an Event      Bar Guide      Community Groups      In Memoriam      Outguide Categories      Outguide Advertisers      Search Outguide      Travel      Dining Out      Blogs      Spotlight  Video      News Videos      Nightspots Videos      Entertainment Videos      Queercast Videos      Comedy Videos     
Classifieds      Real Estate      Place a  Classified     

Windy City Media Group produces Windy City Queercast, & publishes Windy City Times,
The Weekly Voice of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Trans Community,
Nightspots, Out! Resource Guide, and Identity.
5315 N. Clark St. #192, Chicago, IL 60640-2113 • PH (773) 871-7610 • FAX (773) 871-7609.