Windy City Media Group Frontpage News
Celebrating 30 Years of Gay Lesbian Bisexual and Trans News
home search facebook twitter
Gay News Sponsor Windy City Times 2015-04-22
DOWNLOAD ISSUE
About WCMG Publications News Index  Entertainment Features Bars & Clubs Calendar Videos Advertisers OUT! Guide    Marriage


  WINDY CITY TIMES

Illinois rep compares same-sex marriage to statutory rape
by Kate Sosin, Windy City Times
2013-04-12

facebook twitter del.icio.us stumble upon digg google +1 reddit email


An Illinois lawmaker is again under fire for alleged anti-gay comments in emails to constituents.

Rep. Tom Morrison (R-54) compared same-sex marriage to statutory rape in an email obtained by Windy City Times to a constituent.

In the email, Morrison asks where the line would be drawn of same-sex couples were allowed to marry.

"If one male and one female is discriminatory, then isn't limitation of marriage to just two people discriminatory, too?" he wrote. "There are men who would like to marry two or more consenting females. Would you define their relationship as marriage, too? Could a man marry a consenting 9-year old girl? Why not? To refuse them would be discrimination. Again, where would you draw the line?

"If you say a man and a 9-year old girl in marriage is absurd, then I would point out that only 20 years ago or so it would have been considered absurd that two men or two women could marry."

Morrison's position against equal marriage has been well-documented. Last July, he was among a group of lawmakers who introduced a bill reaffirming the state's ban on same-sex marriage.

Last month, he took heat for a similar email exchange with a constituent. According to DailyKos.com, Morrison speculated that if equal marriage passed, "bisexual individuals could argue that they ought to be permitted to marry both sexes at the same time."

Morrison said he regretted his latest, which he said were "inappropriate, inflammatory" and "distracting."

"I do not equate same-sex marriage with marriage to nine-year olds," Morrison said. "I don't want anyone in my district to feel like they are slighted or disrespected."

Morrison said he was trying to make a point that laws are based on value judgments. He also said he emailed his constituent a second time in an effort to clarify his stance. That full email is provided below.

Morrison's email:

Dear [Redacted],

I got an email and phone call tonight from Natasha Korecki at the Chicago Sun-Times. She told me that you were upset by the last email I sent you regarding SB10.

I get hundreds if not thousands of emails everyday, and I do my best to read and personally respond to as many as I can. Sometimes in my haste to deliver, words or thoughts do not translate well.

As you're well aware, we do disagree on this issue and likely will continue to disagree. That's OK. I have my strongly felt reasons, and you have yours.

To be clear, however: I do not equate same sex marriage with statutory rape.

The point I was trying to make was this: the state already has certain restrictions on what marriage is. The law itself makes distinctions on who can and cannot marry. For example, one cannot be married to more than one person at the same time. You are not advocating for polyamory (I don't think), but there are those in Illinois who do. Just google Polyamory Chicago, and see for yourself. They argue that the state is discriminating against their sexual orientation, love, desire to commit, freedom, equality, etc.

The state also defines the age at which individuals may marry. There are groups today that believe young girls ought to be able to marry. Check out the following: ( jonathanturley.org/2010/02/26/marriage "Saudi Cleric Defends Marriage of Nine-Year-Old Girls and Blasts Human Rights Treaties as the Work of Atheists and Fornicators"). Yes, I find that shocking, too! Saudi Arabia is not Illinois obviously, but would this Saudi Cleric consider IL's law on marriage to be discriminatory? Probably. I think it's a fair question to ask. By whose standards do we make our laws? I learned to drive a car at age 10. Was the state prejudicial against me in not allowing me to get a license and drive until I was 16? Why not 15? Why not 12? Why not 10?

So how do we as a society deal with differences of opinion and beliefs on important and emotional issues?

We have a democratic process here. The people's elected representatives are deciding whether or not our state's marriage law should be re-defined. Our society is engaged in a healthy debate about that now. You and I can continue to engage in that now, if you wish, either via email, phone call, or in person. In fact, I will be meeting with a Palatine man who is in a same sex civil union later this summer (assuming SB10 still hasn't been decided by then). You and I could also meet individually or as a group to discuss this.

Changing a law like this is not a light matter. Same sex relationships have been around for millenia, obviously, but codifying marriage as a relationship without regard to gender is a shift of enormous proportions. Interracial marriages have been in existence for millenia, too. Though they were temporarily (in the scope of human history) outlawed in certain jurisdictions, the unions were still of man and woman. That's why I don't believe it's appropriate to say SB10 is analogous with interracial marriage laws, by the way.

Just two years ago, in a lame duck session, the legislature passed a civil unions law. You may believe that it was late in coming, or inadequate, or still discriminatory to same sex couples; you and I haven't discussed those details so I don't know. During the debate two years ago, however, the sponsors of the civil unions bill stated that marriage was not their end goal. They also stated that religious individuals and organizations would not be affected if the civil unions law was enacted. We discovered in short order that neither was the case. Same sex marriage is under discussion now, and two large religious-based adoption agencies have had their state contracts cancelled due to religious beliefs. That's why opponents have real concerns about SB10.

Kathleen, I don't seek to intentionally offend or be condescending to anyone, and if I was to you it was unintentional, and I genuinely apologize. If this ever happens again, please do not hesitate to contact my staff or me personally, and I will do my best to respond in a timely manner.

Sincerely,

Tom


facebook twitter del.icio.us stumble upon digg google +1 reddit email




Windy City Media Group does not approve or necessarily agree with the views posted below.
Please do not post letters to the editor here. Please also be civil in your dialogue.
If you need to be mean, just know that the longer you stay on this page, the more you help us.


  ARTICLES YOU MIGHT LIKE

Study: Number of married same-sex couples triples; one in six in non-marriage states 2015-04-24
Preview: Supreme Court argument April 28 2015-04-20
Tax day shows inequality for legally married same-sex couples 2015-04-15
Report: Manilow married last year 2015-04-15
Study: Support for same-sex marriage rising in all 50 states 2015-04-14
Limited Partnership on Independent Lens, PBS, June 15 2015-04-13
Chicago LGBTs gear up for supreme court decision 2015-04-10
Married same-sex couples denied health care benefits by employers 2015-04-09
VIEWS In God we crust 2015-04-08
Sign company offers custom decor for LGBT weddings 2015-04-08
Planner pens same-sex wedding organizer 2015-04-08
Andrew Sullivan talks marriage, Indiana at Elmhurst lecture 2015-04-07
Gov. Rauner says 'no' to Indiana travel ban 2015-04-01
Campaign looks at Social Security benefits for same-sex couples 2015-03-31
Reports: Married same-sex couples more likely to adopt 2015-03-31
Advocates to argue in Supreme Court marriage cases announced 2015-03-31
LGBTQ media confab looks ahead to post-marriage reporting 2015-03-25
Rainbow Wedding Network holds annual LGBT wedding expo 2015-03-24
Puerto Rico no longer defending marriage ban 2015-03-20
A love affair to remember 2015-03-18
Hilton Orrington hosts first-ever bridal fair 2015-03-17
Presbyterians approve same-sex marriage 2015-03-17
Puerto Rico may drop opposition to same-sex marriage 2015-03-16
Potential advocates for marriage equality in the high court 2015-03-11
Gay marriages halted in Alabama 2015-03-11
Emanuel, Madigan join briefs for marriage equality 2015-03-11
Supreme Ct. to hear marriage case April 28 2015-03-11
National roundup: Supreme Court and marriage; trans-inmate motion 2015-03-10
World news: Slovenia OKs marriage; McKellen aims to save gay pub 2015-03-10
Chamber of commerce hosts LGBT wedding expo 2015-03-10
Emanuel, City of Chicago join other mayors backing marriage equality 2015-03-06
IL Atty Gen. Lisa Madigan joins amicus brief for marriage equality 2015-03-06
Freedom to Marry files amicus brief for U.S. Supreme Court 2015-03-06
Report shows 700,000 Americans part of a same-sex couple 2015-03-05
Supreme Court to hear marriage equality cases on April 28, 2015 2015-03-05
Local entertainment: Queen Latifah; Madonna; Gay horror-movie screening; gay marriage exhibit 2015-03-04
National news shorts: Wedding in Texas; Autopsy, report differ; Gay priest dies 2015-03-03
National roundup: Marriage in Ala. and Neb.; trans suicide 2015-03-03
Gay marriages halted in Alabama 2015-03-03
People's brief for marriage equality to go to Supreme Court 2015-03-03
 



Copyright © 2015 Windy City Media Group. All rights reserved.
Reprint by permission only. PDFs for back issues are downloadable from
our online archives. Single copies of back issues in print form are
available for $4 per issue, older than one month for $6 if available,
by check to the mailing address listed below.

Return postage must accompany all manuscripts, drawings, and
photographs submitted if they are to be returned, and no
responsibility may be assumed for unsolicited materials.
All rights to letters, art and photos sent to Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago
Gay and Lesbian News and Feature Publication) will be treated
as unconditionally assigned for publication purposes and as such,
subject to editing and comment. The opinions expressed by the
columnists, cartoonists, letter writers, and commentators are
their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual and Transegender News and Feature Publication).

The appearance of a name, image or photo of a person or group in
Nightspots (Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times
(a Chicago Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature
Publication) does not indicate the sexual orientation of such
individuals or groups. While we encourage readers to support the
advertisers who make this newspaper possible, Nightspots (Chicago
GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay, Lesbian
News and Feature Publication) cannot accept responsibility for
any advertising claims or promotions.

 

 

 

TRENDINGBREAKINGPHOTOS

Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor


 

Sponsor


Sponsor

About WCMG Publications News Index  Entertainment Features Bars & Clubs Calendar Videos Advertisers OUT! Guide    Marriage



About WCMG      Contact Us      Online Front  Page      Windy City  Times      Nightspots      OUT! Guide     
Identity      BLACKlines      En La Vida      Archives      Subscriptions      Distribution      Windy City Queercast     
Queercast Archives      Advertising  Rates      Deadlines      Advanced Search     
Press  Releases      Event Photos      Join WCMG  Email List      Email Blast     
Upcoming Events      Todays Events      Ongoing Events      Post an Event      Bar Guide      Community Groups      In Memoriam      Outguide Categories      Outguide Advertisers      Search Outguide      Travel      Dining Out      Blogs      Spotlight  Video     
Classifieds      Real Estate      Place a  Classified     

Windy City Media Group produces Windy City Queercast, & publishes Windy City Times,
The Weekly Voice of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Trans Community,
Nightspots, Out! Resource Guide, and Identity.
5315 N. Clark St. #192, Chicago, IL 60640-2113 • PH (773) 871-7610 • FAX (773) 871-7609.