Windy City Media Group Frontpage News
Celebrating 30 Years of Gay Lesbian Bisexual and Trans News
home search facebook twitter join
Gay News Sponsor
About WCMG Publications News  Entertainment Features Donate Bars & Clubs Calendar Advertisers OUT! Guide    Marriage

Sponsor


  WINDY CITY TIMES

Gay Man Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Stay Execution and Order District Court to Hear New Evidence of Jury's Anti-Gay Bias
2019-11-01

facebook twitter google +1 reddit email


( Washington, D.C. ) Attorneys for Charles Rhines filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus with the U.S. Supreme Court today and asked the Court to direct a federal district court to hear new evidence of some jurors' anti-gay bias. New evidence shows that some of the jurors who sentenced Mr. Rhines to death knew that he was gay and thought he would enjoy life in prison with other men if they did not vote for death. No court has ever considered the new evidence on the merits or judged the constitutionality of Mr. Rhines's death sentence in light of it. He is scheduled to be executed during a week-long window beginning Sunday, November 3, 2019.

Mr. Rhines's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus can be viewed here: tinyurl.com/yxmpkmxs .

"Anti-gay prejudice should never have any role in sentencing a man to death. It is shocking that no court has ever considered the new evidence of some jurors' anti-gay statements. The U.S. Supreme Court must intervene to make sure a court hears this evidence before Mr. Rhines is executed," said Shawn Nolan, Chief, Capital Habeas Unit, Community Federal Defender Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Rhines's attorney.

During jury deliberations, the jury sent a note to the judge that indicated that Mr. Rhines's status as a gay man had become a focal point for deliberations. The note asked whether, if sentenced to life without parole, Mr. Rhines would "be allowed to mix with the general inmate population," be able to "brag about his crime to other inmates, especially new and/or young men," enjoy "conjugal visits" and asked other questions about Mr. Rhines's access to other men while in prison. ( Petition at p. 3. )

The new evidence comes in the form of three statements from jurors who served at Mr. Rhines's capital trial and sentencing. One juror stated that the jury "knew that [Mr. Rhines] was a homosexual and thought that he shouldn't be able to spend his life with men in prison." Another juror recalled a juror commenting that "if he's gay we'd be sending him where he wants to go if we voted for [life without parole]." A third juror confirmed that "[t]here was lots of discussion of homosexuality. There was a lot of disgust." ( Petition at p. 3. )

The new evidence confirms what the jury's note strongly indicated at the time of Mr. Rhines's sentencing: anti-gay bias played a role in some jurors' decisions to impose the death penalty on Mr. Rhines. No court has ever held an evidentiary hearing or determined whether he suffered a violation of his right to an impartial jury.

In 2017, in Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado, the U.S. Supreme Court held that states must consider evidence that jurors relied on racial stereotypes or animus to convict a defendant in a non-capital case. Attorneys for Mr. Rhines argue that since the principles underlying Peña-Rodriguez apply to anti-gay prejudice, the Court should allow Mr. Rhines the opportunity to present evidence that anti-gay bias was a factor in some jurors' decisions to sentence him to death. The need for review is especially compelling because the anti-gay bias in Mr. Rhines's case may have made the difference between life and death.

A broad array of prominent organizations have urged courts to intervene and / or spoken out about the unfairness in this case, including the American Bar Association, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., American Civil Liberties Union, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Human Rights Campaign, National LGBT Bar Association, and National Center for Lesbian Rights.

The U.S. Supreme Court has the power to entertain an original habeas petition and transfer it to a federal district court. The Court exercised this power in Troy Davis's case in 2009.

Also today, attorneys for Mr. Rhines petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to obtain the assistance of psychiatric and neuropsychological experts in support of his petition for reprieve and clemency. Congress created a right for indigent death-sentenced state prisoners to obtain legal and expert services in support of these requests. Mr. Rhines has sought the assistance of experts to attest to his cognitive and psychiatric impairments. Absent a court order, state corrections officials have for years refused to permit his experts to evaluate him in person. Mr. Rhines's petition for certiorari can be viewed at https://tinyurl.com/y669t4m9

Rhines Case Overview

Jurors who voted for death expressed a desire to prevent Mr. Rhines from serving a life sentence "with men in prison," or enjoying "conjugal visits," and made other statements that showed a disgust for his sexual orientation. Anti-gay bias should have no role in a capital jury's life or death decision-making. ( Petition at p. 3. )

Before trial, Mr. Rhines's attorneys asked prospective jurors if they had any anti-gay bias that would prevent them from giving Mr. Rhines a fair trial. The jurors selected to hear his case said they could be fair and free of prejudice. The new evidence indicates otherwise. ( Petition at p. 4. )

At trial, the jury heard through witnesses presented by the state that Mr. Rhines was gay and had relationships with other men. They were asked to choose between life in prison without parole and the death penalty for a murder committed when an employee surprised Mr. Rhines in the course of a commercial burglary. During their deliberations, the jury sent a note to the judge showing that deliberations had become infected with anti-gay stereotypes and prejudices. Among other things, the jurors asked whether Mr. Rhines would be allowed to:

- "mix with the general inmate population;"

- "create a group of followers or admirers;"

- "brag about his crime to other inmates, especially new and/or young men jailed for lesser crimes;"

- be "jailed alone or … have a cellmate;" or

- "marry or have conjugal visits."

The judge did not address these questions and failed to head off the anti-gay bias that the questions revealed. The same day, about eight hours later, the jury voted to sentence Mr. Rhines to death. ( Petition at pp. 5-6. )

New evidence confirms that Mr. Rhines's sexual orientation was a focal point for jury deliberations. Three jurors have made statements indicating that anti-gay prejudices played a significant role in the jury's decision to impose the death penalty instead of life without the possibility of parole. One juror stated that the jury "knew that [Mr. Rhines] was a homosexual and thought that he shouldn't be able to spend his life with men in prison." Another juror recalled a juror commenting that "if he's gay, we'd be sending him where he wants to go if we voted for [life without parole]." A third juror confirmed that "[t]here was lots of discussion of homosexuality. There was a lot of disgust. This is a farming community . . . . There were lots of folks who were like, 'Ew, I can't believe that.'" ( Petition at pp. 3, 8. )

Mr. Rhines is seeking to prove that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial capital sentencing jury. The Court must not allow anti-gay bias to infect jury decision-making. In 2017, the Court held that states must consider evidence that jurors relied on racial stereotypes or prejudice in convicting a defendant. ( Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado ) The Court explained that this ruling helped "ensure that our legal system remains capable of coming ever closer to the promise of equal treatment under the law that is so central to a functioning democracy."

Pena-Rodriguez, where the Court intervened to ensure the right to an impartial jury, was a noncapital case. The need for the Court's review is even more urgent in this case because Mr. Rhines is facing the death penalty. As Mr. Rhines's petition states, "Anti-gay bias, if left unaddressed in this case, risks systemic harm to the justice system and, in particular, capital jury sentencing." ( Petition at p. 19. )

In Pena-Rodriguez, two jurors came forward to state that a third juror, during deliberations on guilt in a noncapital case, had expressed anti-Hispanic bias toward the defendant and the defendant's alibi witness. The Court held that the Sixth Amendment required the trial court to consider the evidence that the juror relied on racial stereotypes or animus and the state rule against inquiring into jury deliberations had to give way. ( Petition at p. 19. )

Racial bias in the determination of guilt was intolerable in Pena-Rodriguez, and so too was the anti-gay bias that infected Mr. Rhines's sentencing decision. Prejudice based on sexual orientation is a long-standing and deeply rooted facet of American life. ( Petition at p. 14. )

The Court has acknowledged this reality. For example, the Court recently observed that "[u]ntil the mid—20th century, same-sex intimacy long had been condemned as immoral by the state itself in most Western nations, a belief often embodied in the criminal law." ( Obergefell v. Hodges ) The lower courts have recognized the harmful effects of anti-gay stereotypes, including that gays and lesbians are "promiscuous, … 'disease vectors' or child molesters." ( SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Abbott Labs. )

Juries have discretion, but they cannot be permitted to abuse their discretion by allowing racial and anti-gay prejudices to affect their votes. As the Court has recognized, death is different than all other punishments and requires a greater degree of scrutiny. ( Petition at pp. 27-28. ) The stereotypes and disapproval of Mr. Rhines's sexual orientation cannot stand as an influence on the jurors' decision to sentence him to death.

—From a press release


facebook twitter google +1 reddit email





Windy City Media Group does not approve or necessarily agree with the views posted below.
Please do not post letters to the editor here. Please also be civil in your dialogue.
If you need to be mean, just know that the longer you stay on this page, the more you help us.


  ARTICLES YOU MIGHT LIKE

Gay News

COVID-19 restriction measures for Chicago start Oct. 30 2020-10-27
- Gov. Pritzker and the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) announced COVID-19 resurgence mitigations will be implemented in Region 11—the City of Chicago—beginning at 12:01 a.m. on Friday, Oct. 30. ...


Gay News

Same-sex parents are 7X more likely to raise adopted, foster children 2020-10-27
--From a Williams Institute press release - A summary of data on same-sex parenting to inform reporting on Fulton v. City of Philadelphia On Nov. 5, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. The case will ...


Gay News

Justice Amy Coney Barrett confirmed to U.S. Supreme Court, groups respond 2020-10-26
--From press releases - NCLR Statement on Rushed Confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett to U.S. Supreme Court: SAN FRANCISCO, CA — Today, the United States Senate voted along party lines to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to a lifetime appointment ...


Gay News

U.S. Senate confirms Coney Barrett to Supreme Court 2020-10-26
- The U.S. Senate voted Oct. 26 to confirm the nomination of right-wing federal appeals judge Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court. The vote was 52 to 48, with only one Republican voting against confirmation. ...


Gay News

Lightfoot imposes curfew on city, cracks down on bars 2020-10-22
- In light of a spike of coronavirus infections in the city, Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot followed through Oct. 22 by imposing a 10 p.m. curfew on all nonessential city businesses, The Chicago Tribune reported. In addition, ...


Gay News

Black sex offenders twice as likely as White to be civilly committed 2020-10-22
--From a Williams Institute press release - There are more than 6,300 sex offenders detained in state and federal civil commitment programs in the United States, according to a new study by the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law. Results from states ...


Gay News

Inclusive curriculum tools offered to schools during LGBTQ History Month 2020-10-20
--From a press release - October is LGBTQ History Month, and a coalition of LGBTQ organizations are celebrating by making tools available to school administrators, educators, youth, and families to help implement the state's new Inclusive Curriculum Law. The Illinois Inclusiv ...


Gay News

WORLD French plan, 'gay panic' defense, trans youth case, Northern Triangle 2020-10-19
- The French government unveiled a national plan to combat hatred and discrimination against LGBTQ people, and the initiative emphasises the importance of inclusive education in stamping out homophobia, RFI.fr reported. The three-year plan aims to make ...


Gay News

Alliance of Illinois Judges hosting 'Coming Out Stories' 2020-10-14
- In celebration of National Coming Out Day (which took place Oct. 11), the Alliance of Illinois Judges (AIJ) unveiled the short film Coming Out Stories. Coming Out Stories features members of the judiciary sharing coming out ...


Gay News

Court declines to review ruling ordering medically care for Idaho trans prisoner 2020-10-14
--From a NCLR press release - WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, the United States Supreme Court declined to review a federal court decision ordering the Idaho Department of Corrections (IDOC) to provide medically necessary gender confirmation surgery ...


Gay News

LGBT issues front and center on Barrett hearing second day 2020-10-14
- LGBT issues were front and center in Day Two of the confirmation hearing for U.S. Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, with Democrats and even a few Republicans attempting to clarify how she might approach such ...


Gay News

Born Perfect responds to Barrett's use of "preference" 2020-10-13
--From a press release - WASHINGTON, DC — Today during confirmation hearings in front of the United States Senate Judiciary Committee, Judge Amy Coney Barrett used the dangerous term "sexual preference" when responding to Sen. Dianne Feinstein about her commitment to ...


Gay News

LETTER TO THE EDITOR Lambda Legal responds to nomination of Judge Barrett 2020-10-13
--From a press release - Lambda Legal sent a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee urging its members to oppose Judge Amy Coney Barrett. The rushed confirmation hearings began today for President Trump's nominee to fill the seat of the late ...


Gay News

Supreme Court nominee Barrett's past comments troubling 2020-10-13
- U.S. Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, whose confirmation hearing began Monday, predicted in 2016 that "religious exemption cases" were going to be big in the coming years, as well as cases deciding whether there can ...


Gay News

Nat'l Fair Housing Alliance, LGBTQ+ Real Estate Alliance address discrimination 2020-10-12
--From a press release - St. Paul, Minn. — The new LGBTQ+ Real Estate Alliance has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the National Fair Housing Alliance (NFHA) allowing for joint efforts to identify and rid the nation of housing ...


 



Copyright © 2020 Windy City Media Group. All rights reserved.
Reprint by permission only. PDFs for back issues are downloadable from
our online archives. Single copies of back issues in print form are
available for $4 per issue, older than one month for $6 if available,
by check to the mailing address listed below.

Return postage must accompany all manuscripts, drawings, and
photographs submitted if they are to be returned, and no
responsibility may be assumed for unsolicited materials.
All rights to letters, art and photos sent to Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago
Gay and Lesbian News and Feature Publication) will be treated
as unconditionally assigned for publication purposes and as such,
subject to editing and comment. The opinions expressed by the
columnists, cartoonists, letter writers, and commentators are
their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual and Transegender News and Feature Publication).

The appearance of a name, image or photo of a person or group in
Nightspots (Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times
(a Chicago Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature
Publication) does not indicate the sexual orientation of such
individuals or groups. While we encourage readers to support the
advertisers who make this newspaper possible, Nightspots (Chicago
GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay, Lesbian
News and Feature Publication) cannot accept responsibility for
any advertising claims or promotions.

 

 

 

TRENDINGBREAKINGPHOTOS







Sponsor
Sponsor


 



About WCMG Publications News  Entertainment Features Donate Bars & Clubs Calendar Advertisers OUT! Guide    Marriage


About WCMG      Contact Us      Online Front  Page      Windy City  Times      Nightspots      OUT! Guide     
Identity      BLACKlines      En La Vida      Archives      Subscriptions      Distribution      Windy City Queercast     
Queercast Archives      Advertising  Rates      Deadlines      Advanced Search     
Press  Releases      Event Photos      Join WCMG  Email List      Email Blast     
Upcoming Events      Todays Events      Ongoing Events      Post an Event      Bar Guide      Community Groups      In Memoriam      Outguide Categories      Outguide Advertisers      Search Outguide      Travel      Dining Out      Blogs     
Privacy Policy      Classifieds      Real Estate      Place a  Classified     

Windy City Media Group publishes Windy City Times,
The Bi-Weekly Voice of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Trans Community.
5315 N. Clark St. #192, Chicago, IL 60640-2113 • PH (773) 871-7610 • FAX (773) 871-7609.