A federal judge declared Pennsylvania's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional on May 20, saying it's time to toss such laws "into the ash heap of history," USA Today reported.
The ruling by Judge John E. Jones III makes Pennsylvania the last Northeast state to allow same-sex marriages, although the state could challenge the decision before the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The state's Democratic attorney general, Kathleen Kane, had declined to defend the law in court. Republican Gov. Tom Corbett took up the case, with lawyers for his administration arguing that states have the right to determine the definition of marriage.
Pa. state Rep. Brian Sims, D-Phila., the first openly gay person elected to Pennsylvania's General Assembly praised a federal court ruling in the Whitewood v. Wolf marriage equality case. In a statement, he said, "Today, a federal court in Pennsylvania has affirmed what a majority of Pennsylvanians already support: the fundamental right to marry the person they love."
In a separate statement, ACLU Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Project senior staff attorney Leslie Cooper said, "This is yet another win in a long line of rulings finding that denying same-sex couples the protections and dignity of marriage is unconstitutional."
Eighteen states and the District of Columbia currently allow same-sex couples to marry, and courts across the country, including those in Oklahoma, Utah, Arkansas, and Idaho, have struck down state laws banning marriage for same-sex couples, the ACLU stated.
The May 2, 2014 ACLU news release:
PHILADELPHIA - A federal judge struck down Pennsylvania's ban on marriage for same-sex couples today on the grounds it unconstitutionally discriminates against lesbians and gay men. His order directs the commonwealth to allow same-sex couples to marry and to recognize valid out-of-state marriages.
The ruling came in Whitewood v. Wolf, a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Pennsylvania, volunteer counsel from the law firm of Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, and University of Pennsylvania School of Law Professor Seth Kreimer.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of a widow, 11 couples who wish to marry in Pennsylvania or want the commonwealth to recognize their out-of-state marriages, and two teenage children of one of the plaintiff couples.
"We are overjoyed that we will finally be able to get married in our home state in front of our family and friends," said Christine Donato, who has been in a committed relationship with Sandy Ferlanie for 17 years. They have a six-year-old son, Henry.
In his opinion, Judge John E. Jones III said, "In the sixty years since Brown was decided, 'separate' has thankfully faded into history, and only 'equal' remains. Similarly, in future generations the label same-sex marriage will be abandoned, to be replaced simply by marriage. We are a better people than what these laws represent, and it is time to discard them into the ash heap of history."
"The court, in a bell-ringing opinion, has explained in crystal clear language why the promises of our Constitution extend to all Pennsylvanians. We urge the commonwealth to take whatever steps are necessary to allow marriages to proceed and the celebrations to begin immediately. What a great day!" said Mark Aronchick of Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller.
The commonwealth has thirty days to decide whether to appeal.
"This is yet another win in a long line of rulings finding that denying same-sex couples the protections and dignity of marriage is unconstitutional," said Leslie Cooper, senior staff attorney with the ACLU Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Project. "Across the country, Americans are embracing the idea that same-sex couples and their families deserve to be treated the same as other families."
Eighteen states and the District of Columbia currently allow same-sex couples to marry, and courts across the country, including those in Oklahoma, Utah, Arkansas, and Idaho, have struck down state laws banning marriage for same-sex couples.
"This is a momentous day for our clients and all same-sex couples in Pennsylvania who want to have their love and commitment to each other recognized in the same way as that of other couples," said Reggie Shuford, executive director of the ACLU of Pennsylvania.
More information on this case can be found at: www.aclu.org/lgbt-rights/whitewood-v-wolf .
Pennsylvania governor will not appeal marriage equality decision
From an May 21, 2014 ACLU press release
HARRISBURG, Pa. Governor Tom Corbett announced today that he will not appeal yesterday's federal court decision striking down Pennsylvania's ban on marriage for same-sex couples. His announcement makes the commonwealth the 19th state to grant same-sex couples the freedom to marry. The case was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Pennsylvania, volunteer counsel from the law firm of Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, and University of Pennsylvania School of Law Professor Seth Kreimer.
"We applaud the governor for letting the constitutional principles of freedom and equality ring throughout Pennsylvania by allowing loving same-sex couples to marry. As the judge noted, we are a better people than the marriage ban and the Governor's historic decision not to appeal will be an enduring legacy." Witold Walczak, legal director of the ACLU of Pennsylvania and Mark Aronchick of Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller.
"This is a milestone for our movement. It reinforces the reality that this isn't a partisan issue. It's about fundamental fairness and dignity for all people, including lesbians and gay men," James Esseks, director of the ACLU Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Project.
More information on this case can be found at: www.aclu.org/lgbt-rights/whitewood-v-wolf .