Windy City Media Group Frontpage News
Celebrating 30 Years of Gay Lesbian Bisexual and Trans News
home search facebook twitter join
Gay News Sponsor Windy City Times 2019-06-26
DOWNLOAD ISSUE
About WCMG Publications News Index  Entertainment Features Bars & Clubs Calendar Videos Advertisers OUT! Guide    Marriage

Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor

  WINDY CITY TIMES

ANALYSIS: Md. Court Upholds Same-Sex Marriage Ban
by Lisa Keen
2007-09-26

facebook twitter google +1 reddit email


The supreme court of Maryland, on Sept. 18, reversed a lower court decision which had found a constitutional right for gay couples to marry. The decision made Maryland the fifth state high court in less than two years to uphold as legal the withholding of marriage licenses from same-sex couples.

Gay legal activist Evan Wolfson, head of the national Freedom to Marry group, called the decision 'deeply flawed' and said the 4 to 3 majority never even tried to answer the key question of how excluding gay couples affects the ability of heterosexual couples to procreate.

The Maryland lawsuit Conaway v. Deane challenged the state's marriage law that, in 1973, defined marriage as being only between a man and a woman. The ACLU, which led the challenge, argued that the restriction amounted to sex discrimination against gay people.

But the majority of the court upheld the law as written and concluded that, because gay people have never been legally designated as a 'suspect class'—a legal designation for an oppressed minority—the government did not need to show any compelling reason for denying them equal treatment under the law. Instead, said the majority, all the government need show was a simple rational reason—the lowest level of review for the statute.

And the government's simple rational reason—that licenses to heterosexual couples foster procreation and encourage the traditional family structure—is plausible, said the majority.

Gay civil rights supporters were dismayed.

Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese called the decision a 'setback.' National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Executive Director Matt Foreman called it 'demeaning.'

'Today is a sad day for all Maryland families,' said Jennifer Chrisler, executive director of Family Pride, a national organization that advocates on behalf of LGBT families. But she and others vowed not to give up.

'The struggle for marriage equality is far from over,' said Chrisler.

Equality Maryland's Dan Furmansky vowed to continue the fight and called on the state legislature to rewrite the law. That same day, Democratic State Senator Gwen Britt announced she would introduce legislation next year to allow same-sex couples to marry, assuring the fight would now move to the state legislature, which has approved a state law barring discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Ken Choe, the ACLU attorney who argued on behalf of the gay couples, expressed hope that, unlike the majority of the bench, the legislature would be able to see 'that lesbian and gay couples form committed relationships and loving families just like heterosexual couples.'

The Maryland Court of Appeals majority decision essentially parroted the harsher of two models for state supreme court decisions that have rejected equal rights for gay couples since 1999. That harsher model—carved out by the supreme court of New York in July of last year—finds nothing in the state constitution to require equal treatment of same-sex couples when it comes to marriage licensing. And it uses the lowest level of legal review to determine whether the state has a legitimate reason to treat gay couples differently. That level of review requires only that the government's reason be 'rational.'

In New York's case, the court accepted as rational the state's claim that the marriage law was intended to provide a special 'inducement' for heterosexuals to marry. That model was essentially adopted by the Washington Supreme Court later in 2006 when it said 'the legislature was entitled to believe that limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples furthers procreation … and furthers the well-being of children by encouraging families where children are reared in homes headed by the children's biological parents.' Maryland argued that the purpose of the state's marriage law was 'fostering procreation and encouraging the traditional family structure.'

The second model—initiated by the Vermont Supreme Court in 1999— finds that the state's constitution requires gay couples be treated equally but passes the buck to the legislature to determine how that will happen. New Jersey adopted that approach in October of last year with its ruling in Lewis v. Harris. Both Vermont and New Jersey legislatures chose 'civil unions' as the means of providing 'equal' benefits.

Last year, other state supreme courts—in Tennessee and Georgia—allowed ballot measures seeking to ban gay marriage to proceed.

Only one state supreme court—the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, in November 2003—has declared that a state's constitutional promise of equal protection of the law requires the state to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples the same as it does to heterosexual couples. The Hawaii Supreme Court ruled that denying same-sex couples marriage licenses was sex discrimination but the legislature passed a constitutional amendment to redefine marriage, thus taking the matter away from the court.

The first ever state supreme court ruling concerning same-sex marriage came in 1971 when the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that the state could deny a marriage license to a same-sex couple. That lawsuit, Baker v. Nelson, was dismissed by the U.S. Supreme Court with no explanation beyond 'want of a substantial federal question.' In what might also be considered a piece of the silver lining in the ruling, the majority rejected the notion that the Baker dismissal required it to reject plaintiffs' case out of hand.

A decision on a similar case is now pending in the Connecticut Supreme Court and will be argued soon in the California Supreme Court.


facebook twitter google +1 reddit email





Windy City Media Group does not approve or necessarily agree with the views posted below.
Please do not post letters to the editor here. Please also be civil in your dialogue.
If you need to be mean, just know that the longer you stay on this page, the more you help us.


  ARTICLES YOU MIGHT LIKE

Gay News

WORLD Mexican marriage bill, Sir Elton John, global Pride events 2019-06-25 - In Mexico, Sinaloa lawmakers voted against a measure that would have legalized same-sex marriage in the state, with 20 votes against and 18 ...


Gay News

Ecuador approves same-sex marriage 2019-06-13 - By a vote of five to four, Ecuador's highest court approved same-sex marriage in a landmark ruling in the small and traditionally Catholic ...


Gay News

WORLD Filipino survey, Eurovision remarks, North Macedonian march 2019-05-28 - The Philippines House of Representatives is conducting an online survey on same-sex unions, CNN Philippines noted. The poll, posted on the chamber's website, ...


Gay News

Taiwan becomes first Asian country to OK same-sex marriage 2019-05-18 - On May 17, Taiwan's legislature became the first in Asia ( by a vote of 66 to 27 ) to fully legalize same-sex ...


Gay News

WORLD Extremists charged, Virgin Mary controversy, Taiwan marriage bill 2019-05-14 - Eight Islamist extremists from a banned group were charged by Bangladesh police for the 2016 murders of two prominent gay-rights activists, AFP reported. ...


Gay News

Majority of Public Favors Same-Sex Marriage, Divisions Persist 2019-05-14 - WASHINGTON, D.C. ( May 14, 2019 ) — After years of generally steady increases, opinions about same-sex marriage are mostly unchanged since 2017. ...


Gay News

WORLD Trans woman threatened, Ecuador marriage bill, equality coin 2019-04-30 - Armenia's first registered transgender woman, Lilit Martirosyan, has received death threats after making a historic speech in her country's national assembly, The Guardian ...


Gay News

WORLD Taiwan marriages, Indian prince, gay Mexican candidate 2019-04-23 - A total of 157 same-sex couples in Taiwan plan to register to get married at household registration offices on May 24—the day that ...


Gay News

WORLD Mexican marriage bill, Luxembourg PM, China watching Buttigieg 2019-04-16 - In a secret ballot, the plenary of the Yucatan state congress in Mexico voted against a marriage-equality bill that was forwarded by a ...


Gay News

Cayman Islands court blocks marriage equality 2019-04-11 - Days after Cayman Islands Chief Justice Anthony Smellie allowed a same-sex wedding to take place, the Court of Appeal blocked Chantelle Day and ...


 



Copyright © 2019 Windy City Media Group. All rights reserved.
Reprint by permission only. PDFs for back issues are downloadable from
our online archives. Single copies of back issues in print form are
available for $4 per issue, older than one month for $6 if available,
by check to the mailing address listed below.

Return postage must accompany all manuscripts, drawings, and
photographs submitted if they are to be returned, and no
responsibility may be assumed for unsolicited materials.
All rights to letters, art and photos sent to Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago
Gay and Lesbian News and Feature Publication) will be treated
as unconditionally assigned for publication purposes and as such,
subject to editing and comment. The opinions expressed by the
columnists, cartoonists, letter writers, and commentators are
their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual and Transegender News and Feature Publication).

The appearance of a name, image or photo of a person or group in
Nightspots (Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times
(a Chicago Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature
Publication) does not indicate the sexual orientation of such
individuals or groups. While we encourage readers to support the
advertisers who make this newspaper possible, Nightspots (Chicago
GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay, Lesbian
News and Feature Publication) cannot accept responsibility for
any advertising claims or promotions.

 

 

 

TRENDINGBREAKINGPHOTOS

Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor


 



About WCMG Publications News Index  Entertainment Features Bars & Clubs Calendar Videos Advertisers OUT! Guide    Marriage


About WCMG      Contact Us      Online Front  Page      Windy City  Times      Nightspots      OUT! Guide     
Identity      BLACKlines      En La Vida      Archives      Subscriptions      Distribution      Windy City Queercast     
Queercast Archives      Advertising  Rates      Deadlines      Advanced Search     
Press  Releases      Event Photos      Join WCMG  Email List      Email Blast     
Upcoming Events      Todays Events      Ongoing Events      Post an Event      Bar Guide      Community Groups      In Memoriam      Outguide Categories      Outguide Advertisers      Search Outguide      Travel      Dining Out      Blogs      Spotlight  Video     
Classifieds      Real Estate      Place a  Classified     

Windy City Media Group publishes Windy City Times,
The Bi-Weekly Voice of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Trans Community.
5315 N. Clark St. #192, Chicago, IL 60640-2113 • PH (773) 871-7610 • FAX (773) 871-7609.