Windy City Media Group Frontpage News

THE VOICE OF CHICAGO'S GAY, LESBIAN, BI, TRANS AND QUEER COMMUNITY SINCE 1985

home search facebook twitter join
Gay News Sponsor Windy City Times 2023-12-13
DOWNLOAD ISSUE
Donate

Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor

  WINDY CITY TIMES

Senate Committee Holds Third Hearing on Gay Marriage Amendment
by Bob Roehr
2004-03-24

This article shared 3297 times since Wed Mar 24, 2004
facebook twitter google +1 reddit email


The Senate's third hearing on the threat of gay marriage, on March 23, was a strange mix of acrimony and ennui. In the end, it was unclear whether any movement had been made in any direction, or when the committee might again take up the issue.

'The traditional institution of marriage is not about discrimination—it is about children,' asserted Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), chair of the Judiciary subcommittee on the Constitution.

'Activist judges,' in finding that banning gay couples from marrying discriminates against them, are 'accusing ordinary Americans of prejudice, while abolishing American traditions by judicial fiat,' he said.

'The only way to save laws deemed 'unconstitutional' by activist judges is a constitutional amendment.'

Cornyn said these activists 'accuse others of writing discrimination into the Constitution, yet they are the ones writing the American people out of our constitutional democracy.'

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (California), the ranking Democrat on the committee, called the Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) 'ill-timed and ill-advised...It would, if enacted, become the first amendment to limit rights' and inject the federal government into the area of family law that heretofore had been the sole responsibility of the states.

She lay into a revised version of the FMA introduced only the day before [call it FMA+] by Sen. Wayne Allard and Rep. Marilyn Musgrave, both Colorado Republicans and original sponsors of the FMA.

'I think this change of language is a good indication of how controversial and complex this issue is – here, on the eve of a hearing into the text of one amendment, we see a change in language so dramatic that we are now really confronted with a different amendment altogether, with its own unique problems,' Feinstein said. Amending the Constitution 'Is not a process best done overnight, on a moment's notice.'

Allard called the changes a minor tinkering to make his original intent more clear. Those were to define marriage as only between a man and a woman; to provide a definite role for the state legislatures in enacting other types of legal protections for same-sex couples; and to limit the judiciary.

Rep Barney Frank was at his most combative as the second witness on the panel of experts. He said the wording of the amendment would prohibit states from offering protections such as those of civil unions and domestic partners benefits.

'We [gay people] want to express love in the same way that you do,' said Frank. 'If I choose to associate with another man, how does that hurt you?'

'Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. What you have with marriage, we admire it, we would like to be able to share it,' Frank said. 'If you are not prepared to make it illegal for gays to have children,' and few people are proposing that, then how can you justify not giving those children the same legal protections as their schoolmates have in their households.

He pointed to Massachusetts, where a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage is likely to be put to the citizens to vote up or down. But a FMA would preclude that; 'If the people decide to allow it [gay marriage], you will cancel it out.'

'I oppose any amendment that seeks to write discrimination into our United States Constitution,' said Rep John Lewis, a long-time civil rights activist and ordained Baptist minister. Conservatives have scorned any attempt to link the black and gay civil rights movements.

Lewis said, 'I ask the question: Where would we be as a nation if Congress in 1954, fifty years ago, had radically amended our constitution to uphold segregation or the separate but equal doctrine? I further ask: Where would we be as a nation if Congress in 1967 made it unconstitutional for interracial couples to marry?'

'I have fought too hared and too long against discrimination based on race and color not to stand up against discrimination based on sexual orientation.'

During discussion, Allard said his intent in clarifying the language was 'to remove any doubt that we were trying to limit' a state's authority to write laws governing civil unions or domestic partner arrangements for same-sex partners. He was simply trying to limit the actions of the courts on constitutional matters.

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) recalled the oath of office he had taken 'to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States.' He was more than troubled by the fact that changes they were discussing 'had been delivered to us less than 24-hours ago.'

'I disagree that they are just technical changes,' he said. Durbin interpreted the phrase 'or the legal incidence of marriage' to include health insurance coverage through domestic partner type arrangements or benefits programs of private employers.

He wondered why the words 'unmarried couples or groups' had been deleted, and the amendment no longer banned polygamy. He asked whether traditional marriage includes polygamy? Does it bar interracial marriage? He lamented that the sponsors of the bill were not present to explain their intent.

Senator Feinstein thought the FMA+ would stand existing principles of governance on their head by 'giving the legislatures more authority than the [state] constitution.' She found it 'puzzling' that the proposed FMA+ 'allows general law to trump the constitution. I believe this is unprecedented.'

Cass R. Sunstein, a professor at the University of Chicago Law School agreed, the FMA 'shows contempt' for the federal process.

Sunstein believes, if the FMA+ were to become part of the US Constitution, a ballot initiative passed by the voters of California to allow gay marriage would be legal and if it took the form of a common law, but it would be unconstitutional under the US Constitution and FMA+ if it took the form of an amendment to the California Constitution.

Phyllis Bossin testified for the American Bar Association as chair of their section on family law. She said they oppose 'any constitutional amendment that would restrict the ability of a state to protect the rights of children by determining the qualifications for civil marriage between two persons within its jurisdiction.'

She belittled fears that have led to the proposed amendment. 'One does not amend the Constitution on a hunch. One does not amend the Constitution to call a halt to democratic debate within the states. An amendment should be reserved for the most urgent and compelling circumstances. It is a last resort.'

Toward the very end of the hearing Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama) revealed what was for him the principle rationale for the language of the FMA; It's a way to get at activist federal judges who find claims of equal protection in the US Constitution for gays and other minorities.

'It goes to the separation of powers,' he said. If we 'allow the judicial branch to depart from the law...then we have lost our democracy.' To Sessions, it was all about raw majority rule with no concern for minority protections.

But it seems that most Republican members of Congress do not share his concerns. Focus on the Family had sent emails to its supporters urging them to contact their senators and have them ask tough question, otherwise the record 'will tip in favor of homosexual activists.' But the Republican members of the committee continued to stay away in droves, while the Democrats have appeared in force.

At today's hearing, chief sponsor of the FMA in the House, Marilyn Musgrave appeared only briefly to read a statement and did not stay for questions. While Allard left partway through the question session. Barney Frank sees this as an indication that most Republican congressmen do not want to deal with this issue.


This article shared 3297 times since Wed Mar 24, 2004
facebook twitter google +1 reddit email

Out and Aging
Presented By

  ARTICLES YOU MIGHT LIKE

Gay News

Thailand parliament passes landmark marriage bill 2024-03-27
- On March 27, Thailand's parliament approved a marriage-equality bill by an overwhelmingly large margin—a landmark step that moves one of Asia's most liberal countries closer to legalizing same-sex unions, media ...


Gay News

NATIONAL Va. marriage bill, AARP, online counseling, Idaho items, late activist 2024-03-21
- Republican Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin signed bills protecting same-sex marriages at a state level, surprising some, WRIC reported. The bills—passed out of both chambers along mostly party lines—will require clerks ...


Gay News

Greek legislature approves marriage equality 2024-02-15
- Greece has become the 36th country, and the first Christian Orthodox-majority one, to legalize same-sex marriage. The BBC reported that same-sex couples will now also be legally allowed to adopt children after the 176-76 vote that ...


Gay News

Tenn. legislators back bill that lets officials refuse to perform same-sex weddings 2024-02-15
- Defying a national ruling that authorized marriage equality, Tennessee lawmakers approved a measure that would allow public officials to refuse to perform weddings of same-sex couples, The Hill reported. Tennessee's House Bill 878/Senate Bill 596 says ...


Gay News

WORLD Marriage in Greece, UK politics, cruise death, HRC grants 2024-02-02
- The Holy Synod of the Church of Greece unanimously agreed at a recent meeting that it is "strongly opposed" to the Greek government's promised bill on same-sex marriage and adoption, Balkan Insight reported. The conservative New ...


Gay News

NATIONAL Marriage news, fighting fentanyl, anti-LGBTQ+ crimes, Grindr 2024-02-02
- The Virginia House of Delegates passed a bill that would affirm marriage equality in the state, The Washington Blade noted. House Bill 174, introduced by state Del. Rozia Henson (D-Prince William County), passed in the Democratic-controlled ...


Gay News

WORLD Activist honored, marriages in Estonia, Madrid law, trans sports item 2024-01-05
Video below - The National AIDS Commission (NAC) recently honored Caleb Orozco—a leading figure in the fight for LGBTQ+ rights in Belize—for his instrumental contributions to the national HIV response, BNN reported. According ...


Gay News

Catholic Church allows priests to bless same-sex couples but reaffirms disapproval of gay marriage 2023-12-22
- LGBTQ+ couples can now receive blessings from priests, but the Catholic Church maintained its strict ban on gay marriage, according to a Vatican document approved by Pope Francis Dec. 18. This historic change in doctrine marks ...


Gay News

Greek government vows to back marriage equality 2023-12-22
- Despite opposition from the Church of Greece and within the ruling New Democracy, Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis' government said it will eventually move to legalize same-sex marriage, The National Herald reported. However, no timetable was ...


Gay News

Dignity/Chicago welcomes new rule on church blessings for same-sex marriages 2023-12-18
--From a press release - Dignity/Chicago, the advocacy organization for LGBTQI Catholics and friends, welcomed the news that the Vatican's doctrinal office has officially declared it possible for Catholic priests to bless same-sex unions and ...


Gay News

New Ways Ministry: Pope's blessings approval is Christmas gift to LGBTQ+ Catholics 2023-12-18
--From a press release - MOUNT RAINIER, Maryland—Statement by Francis DeBernardo, Executive Director, New Ways Ministry: Pope Francis gave LGBTQ+ Catholics an early Christmas gift this year by approving blessings for same-gender couples. The Vatican ...


Gay News

Pope Francis changes policy, allowing priests to bless same-sex unions; GLAAD responds 2023-12-18
--From a press release - GLAAD: "By removing barriers to priests blessing LGBTQ couples, the Pope accurately recognizes that LGBTQ people and our relationships are worthy of the same affirmation and support in the Church, and this strengthens couples in their ...


Gay News

LGBTQ+ couple the first in South Asia to have marriage recognized 2023-11-30
- Transgender woman Maya Gurung and Surendra Pandey became the first LGBTQ+ couple to have their marriage legally recognized in South Asia after they received a legal certificate in Nepal's Lamjung district on Nov. 29, The Guardian ...


Gay News

WORLD Thai marriage law, French bill, Miss Universe, IKEA, activist dies 2023-11-24
- Thailand Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin said that the cabinet approved a draft law on marriage equality and that it would be brought to parliament during a session starting in December, Reuters reported. If the draft law ...


Gay News

Pope: Trans people can be baptized and act as godparents 2023-11-09
- Pope Francis has stated that trans people may be baptized and act as godparents or witnesses to marriage under the same conditions as any other adult—as long as a scandal does not result, according to PinkNews. ...


 


Copyright © 2024 Windy City Media Group. All rights reserved.
Reprint by permission only. PDFs for back issues are downloadable from
our online archives.

Return postage must accompany all manuscripts, drawings, and
photographs submitted if they are to be returned, and no
responsibility may be assumed for unsolicited materials.

All rights to letters, art and photos sent to Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago
Gay and Lesbian News and Feature Publication) will be treated
as unconditionally assigned for publication purposes and as such,
subject to editing and comment. The opinions expressed by the
columnists, cartoonists, letter writers, and commentators are
their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature Publication).

The appearance of a name, image or photo of a person or group in
Nightspots (Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times
(a Chicago Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature
Publication) does not indicate the sexual orientation of such
individuals or groups. While we encourage readers to support the
advertisers who make this newspaper possible, Nightspots (Chicago
GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay, Lesbian
News and Feature Publication) cannot accept responsibility for
any advertising claims or promotions.

 
 

TRENDINGBREAKINGPHOTOS






Donate


About WCMG      Contact Us      Online Front  Page      Windy City  Times      Nightspots
Identity      BLACKlines      En La Vida      Archives      Advanced Search     
Windy City Queercast      Queercast Archives     
Press  Releases      Join WCMG  Email List      Email Blast      Blogs     
Upcoming Events      Todays Events      Ongoing Events      Bar Guide      Community Groups      In Memoriam     
Privacy Policy     

Windy City Media Group publishes Windy City Times,
The Bi-Weekly Voice of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Trans Community.
5315 N. Clark St. #192, Chicago, IL 60640-2113 • PH (773) 871-7610 • FAX (773) 871-7609.