Windy City Media Group Frontpage News
Celebrating 30 Years of Gay Lesbian Bisexual and Trans News
home search facebook twitter
Gay News Sponsor Windy City Times 2015-05-20
DOWNLOAD ISSUE
About WCMG Publications News Index  Entertainment Features Bars & Clubs Calendar Videos Advertisers OUT! Guide    Marriage

Sponsor

  WINDY CITY TIMES

Springfield votes against benefits for civil union couples
News update posted Dec. 22, 2011
by Kate Sosin, Windy City Times
2011-12-28

facebook twitter del.icio.us stumble upon digg google +1 reddit email


In a move shocking LGBT rights groups in Illinois, Springfield's city government has voted not to extend health benefits to civil union spouses.

The Joint Labor/Management Health Care Committee, a Springfield committee comprised of staffers from various city positions as well as retirees, voted to keep its current eligibility standards for insurance. But despite civil union law, which extended the same legal rights as marriage to same-sex partners in June, Springfield's benefits have not included civil union partners this year.

The committee voted against extending those benefits in its upcoming fiscal year, which begins March 1.

"It was decided strictly as a cost-saving measure to not expand the benefits at this time," said committee co-chair Melina Tomaras-Collins who is also the city's director of human resources. "The City of Springfield is facing serious financial constraints."

Officials said that according to an actuary, the bill for extending such benefits would total $725,000, or an increase of 3.4 percent. The cost of insurance is already set to rise by 3.75 percent for the city.

Tomaras-Collins said that to date, no one has asked the city for benefits for a civil union partner. She said the committee took that fact into account when it voted unanimously not to extend its benefits.

City officials believe the vote is legal because Springfield has self-funded insurance, meaning money is put aside by the city in anticipation of covering benefit costs, rather than purchased commercially. The city pays the cost of 75 percent of that coverage, with employees making up the difference.

It remains uncertain how an actuary totaled the cost of civil union benefits ( both same-sex and opposite sex ) at $725,000, something that both Tomaras-Collins and the city's Budget Director Bill McCarty said they need clarification on.

Asked for a copy of the actuary's report, Tomaras-Collins said a full report has not yet been released.

Because the city is self-insured, however she said, it would have to set aside the money anticipated by the actuary, even if no one has yet requested civil union benefits.

"It's not an issue of what's right or wrong," she said. "It becomes a matter of what you can do with resources you have."

"They did not want to increase the rolls," added McCarty, who does not sit on the committee. "They didn't take away anything."

Illinois LGBT advocacy groups criticized the decision as contrary to the letter and spirit of civil union law.

Christopher Clark, an attorney with Lambda Legal called the vote "an active decision to discriminate against civil union couples."

"This is a blatant disregard of the civil union law which provides couples in a civil union the same benefits as married couples," said Anthony Martinez, executive director of The Civil Rights Agenda in a statement. "With this vote, the committee has shown that they are willing to openly discriminate, which is also against the law in Illinois."

Others have called into question the legality of denying benefits to civil union spouses.

Part of the problem, said Clark, is that federal law does nothing to prevent Springfield from denying such benefits to civil union same-sex spouses. Clark said that the city might duck behind federal laws which preempt state laws and do not recognize same-sex spouses.

Still, he argued, budget problems should not be put on the backs of one segment of the population. He believes the vote might violate state civil union and anti-discrimination laws, but he said Lambda Legal is still looking at the fine print.

"It's simply unfair," he said.

Tomaras-Collins said it has been the practice of the committee to follow federal mandate on such issues, and that past debates on health benefits have deferred to federal standards.

According to McCarty, there has been talk among some alderman of introducing a city ordinance to overturn the vote.


facebook twitter del.icio.us stumble upon digg google +1 reddit email




Windy City Media Group does not approve or necessarily agree with the views posted below.
Please do not post letters to the editor here. Please also be civil in your dialogue.
If you need to be mean, just know that the longer you stay on this page, the more you help us.


  ARTICLES YOU MIGHT LIKE

Study: Reactions of heterosexual siblings to same-sex marriage advances 2015-05-22
Hinshaw & Culbertson hosts marriage debrief event 2015-05-19
Relationships & the Law Today: Possible Supreme Court marriage outcomes 2015-05-13
VIEWS Getting married 2015-05-13
National roundup: Cleveland's pro-gay move; Hawaii's pro-trans law; trans teen's suicide 2015-05-12
MCC founding pastor presides at blessing of aame-gender couples in Cuba 2015-05-12
Griner, Johnson tie the knot 2015-05-10
Film about 1970s gay marriage screens May 16 with discussion 2015-05-06
World: Nepal outreach; U2 and Russia ban; Ecuadorean civil unions 2015-05-05
Gay Qantas CEO talks marriage, diversity 2015-05-05
Supreme Court deliberations continue in private 2015-05-04
Book details Iowa's marriage path prior to Supreme Court arguments 2015-04-29
Marriage-equality vigil in Crystal Lake 2015-04-29
Kirk takes part in rally outside Supreme Court hearing 2015-04-29
Marriage supporters gather in Chicago after Supreme Court hearings 2015-04-29
Celebrations: Mansfield-Weinstein married April 10 2015-04-29
Marriage equality: The timeline 2015-04-29
Financial pros discuss same-sex marriage 2015-04-28
MOMBIAN Parents moving marriage forward 2015-04-28
Supreme Court hears marriage arguments; the wait begins 2015-04-28
DeBoer, Rowse, Bonauto release statements on today's arguments in marriage cases 2015-04-28
Supreme Court hears arguments challenging same-sex marriage bans 2015-04-28
Reports tout married same-sex couples 2015-04-28
Oregon baker loses final round is bias case 2015-04-24
Study: Number of married same-sex couples triples; one in six in non-marriage states 2015-04-24
Preview: Supreme Court argument April 28 2015-04-20
Tax day shows inequality for legally married same-sex couples 2015-04-15
Report: Manilow married last year 2015-04-15
Study: Support for same-sex marriage rising in all 50 states 2015-04-14
Limited Partnership on Independent Lens, PBS, June 15 2015-04-13
Chicago LGBTs gear up for supreme court decision 2015-04-10
Married same-sex couples denied health care benefits by employers 2015-04-09
VIEWS In God we crust 2015-04-08
Sign company offers custom decor for LGBT weddings 2015-04-08
Planner pens same-sex wedding organizer 2015-04-08
Andrew Sullivan talks marriage, Indiana at Elmhurst lecture 2015-04-07
Gov. Rauner says 'no' to Indiana travel ban 2015-04-01
Campaign looks at Social Security benefits for same-sex couples 2015-03-31
Reports: Married same-sex couples more likely to adopt 2015-03-31
Advocates to argue in Supreme Court marriage cases announced 2015-03-31
 



Copyright © 2015 Windy City Media Group. All rights reserved.
Reprint by permission only. PDFs for back issues are downloadable from
our online archives. Single copies of back issues in print form are
available for $4 per issue, older than one month for $6 if available,
by check to the mailing address listed below.

Return postage must accompany all manuscripts, drawings, and
photographs submitted if they are to be returned, and no
responsibility may be assumed for unsolicited materials.
All rights to letters, art and photos sent to Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago
Gay and Lesbian News and Feature Publication) will be treated
as unconditionally assigned for publication purposes and as such,
subject to editing and comment. The opinions expressed by the
columnists, cartoonists, letter writers, and commentators are
their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual and Transegender News and Feature Publication).

The appearance of a name, image or photo of a person or group in
Nightspots (Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times
(a Chicago Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature
Publication) does not indicate the sexual orientation of such
individuals or groups. While we encourage readers to support the
advertisers who make this newspaper possible, Nightspots (Chicago
GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay, Lesbian
News and Feature Publication) cannot accept responsibility for
any advertising claims or promotions.

 

 

 

TRENDINGBREAKINGPHOTOS

Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor


 



Sponsor

About WCMG Publications News Index  Entertainment Features Bars & Clubs Calendar Videos Advertisers OUT! Guide    Marriage



About WCMG      Contact Us      Online Front  Page      Windy City  Times      Nightspots      OUT! Guide     
Identity      BLACKlines      En La Vida      Archives      Subscriptions      Distribution      Windy City Queercast     
Queercast Archives      Advertising  Rates      Deadlines      Advanced Search     
Press  Releases      Event Photos      Join WCMG  Email List      Email Blast     
Upcoming Events      Todays Events      Ongoing Events      Post an Event      Bar Guide      Community Groups      In Memoriam      Outguide Categories      Outguide Advertisers      Search Outguide      Travel      Dining Out      Blogs      Spotlight  Video     
Classifieds      Real Estate      Place a  Classified     

Windy City Media Group produces Windy City Queercast, & publishes Windy City Times,
The Weekly Voice of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Trans Community,
Nightspots, Out! Resource Guide, and Identity.
5315 N. Clark St. #192, Chicago, IL 60640-2113 • PH (773) 871-7610 • FAX (773) 871-7609.