Windy City Media Group Frontpage News

THE VOICE OF CHICAGO'S GAY, LESBIAN, BI, TRANS AND QUEER COMMUNITY SINCE 1985

home search facebook twitter join
Gay News Sponsor Windy City Times 2023-12-13
DOWNLOAD ISSUE
Donate

Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor

  WINDY CITY TIMES

Calif. Supreme Ct. approves same-sex marriage
News Update Thurs. May 15, 2008 (Second version, expanded.)
by Lisa Keen, Keen News Service
2008-05-14

This article shared 4197 times since Wed May 14, 2008
facebook twitter google +1 reddit email


The California Supreme Court ruled May 15 that state laws prohibiting the recognition of same-sex marriages violate state constitutional rights of gay people.

The 4-3 opinion, joined by three Republican and one Democratic appointee, declared that the 'fundamental nature of the substantive rights embodied in the right to marry—and their central importance to an individual's opportunity to live a happy, meaningful, and satisfying life as a full member of society' requires the California constitution 'be interpreted to guarantee this basic civil right to all individuals and couples, without regard to their sexual orientation.'

The legal issue before the court was whether state laws banning the legal recognition of same-sex marriages in California violate the state constitution's guarantees of equal protection, freedom of expression, right to privacy or the fundamental right to marry. The laws banned both the licensing of same-sex marriage in California and the recognition of same-sex marriages licensed elsewhere.

'It is true, of course, that as an historical matter in this state marriage always has been limited to a union between a man and a woman,' wrote Chief Justice Ronald George, an appointee of former Republican George Deukmejian. 'Tradition alone, however, generally has not been viewed as a sufficient justification for perpetuating, without examination, the restriction or denial of a fundamental constitutional right. ' George cited the landmark 1948 decision by the California Supreme Court that struck down laws banning interracial marriage. That decision, Perez v. Sharp, eventually led to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. Virginia, which struck down anti-miscegenation laws nationally in 1967.

'I could not be happier,' said Evan Wolfson, one of the preeminent gay activist attorneys in the fight for equal marriage rights and head of the national Freedom to Marry group. 'This is the turning point. This is the absolute statement by the nation's most respected state supreme court, and a chief justice who is universally considered to be fair and cautious, affirming that the exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage is wrong and must fall.'

Similar reactions, of joy and euphoria, were expressed by plaintiffs and attorneys who worked on the case, In re Marriages, during a press conference shortly after the decision was released.

'This is a moment of pure happiness and joy,' said Shannon Minter, the lead attorney who argued the case and legal director for the National Center for Lesbian Rights.

'It's a watershed moment,' said Maya Harris, executive director of the ACLU-California. Harris said the decision would take its 'rightful historic place' and 'inspire other rulings that will knock down barriers to the fundamental right to marry.'

California becomes the second state—and the largest in the nation— to enable same-sex couples to obtain marriage licenses. Minter said that marriages can begin to be licensed after the ruling takes effect, in about 30 days.

California's Republican governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has twice vetoed legislation to approve of same-sex marriage, said he will support the supreme court's decision and will not support the anti-gay marriage initiative that is likely to appear on the November ballot.

And, importantly, the majority said that, after reviewing 'numerous California decisions that have examined the underlying bases and significance of the constitutional right to marry,' it concluded that, 'under this state's Constitution, the constitutionally based right to marry properly must be understood to encompass the core set of basic substantive legal rights and attributes traditionally associated with marriage that are so integral to an individual's liberty and personal autonomy that they may not be eliminated or abrogated by the Legislature or by the electorate through the statutory initiative process.'

Because the lawsuits implicated only the state constitution, the decision is not appealable to the U.S. Supreme Court, said Jenny Pizer, senior counsel in Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund's western office.

The lawsuit sprang out of a decision by San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom in 2004 to order city officials to defy state law and begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Newsom's action came just months after the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the state constitution in that state required equal treatment of gay and straight couples in marriage licensing. The national Freedom to Marry organization estimates that about 4,000 gay couples obtained a marriage license in San Francisco before the California Supreme Court ordered it to stop. Attorneys for the plaintiffs said those marriages were voided by the state supreme court when it stopped the city from issuing any more licenses.

The California high court made its decision only two months after hearing more than three hours of oral argument in March on the case. During those arguments, several judges asked whether the issue shouldn't be given to the voters to decide. The questions seemed to be responding to a drumbeat by many prominent Republican politicians—including President George Bush and Republican presidential nominee John McCain—that rulings supporting equal rights to marriage for gay couples are creating new law and going against the will of the majority of people. In fact, all but one of the states that have considered ballot initiatives to ban same-sex marriage have approved them by fairly large margins. The petition to have a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage on the California ballot this November must still be validated by the California Secretary of State, but activists clearly expect it to be the next big battle.

California has been the scene of one of the longest and most vigorous debates over same-sex marriage. The state marriage law was amended by the legislature in 1977 to ban marriage licenses for same-sex couples. In 2000, voters approved Proposition 22 to amend a state law to prohibit California from recognizing same-sex marriages licensed in other states or countries.

The state legislature has twice approved ( in 2005 and 2007 ) —and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has twice vetoed—legislation to allow licensing of same-sex marriages. On May 6, a state appeals court ruled that a gay man who believed his male companion had properly registered as his legal domestic partner was entitled to protection under the state's Domestic Partner Rights and Responsibilities Act, approved in 1999. The ruling provided that the gay partner receive the same legal protection as a person who believed he or she had entered into a legal marriage only to find out later that they had not.

©2008 Keen News Service


This article shared 4197 times since Wed May 14, 2008
facebook twitter google +1 reddit email

Out and Aging
Presented By

  ARTICLES YOU MIGHT LIKE

Gay News

Thailand parliament passes landmark marriage bill
2024-03-27
On March 27, Thailand's parliament approved a marriage-equality bill by an overwhelmingly large margin—a landmark step that moves one of Asia's most liberal countries closer to legalizing same-sex unions, media ...


Gay News

Wyoming is latest state to ban gender-affirming care for minors
2024-03-24
On March 22, Wyoming became the latest state to prohibit gender-affirming care for minors, The Hill noted. In doing so, it joined 23 other states that passed laws restricting or banning the treatment. Legislators in both ...


Gay News

Family of 2004 murder victim holds event in Lake View; reward announced
2024-03-24
The year 2004, for the family and friends of Lake View resident Kevin Clewer, will forever be marked by tragedy. On March 24 of that year, Clewer, 31, was found in his apartment at 3444 N. Elaine Pl.; he was the ...


Gay News

No charges filed in Nex Benedict fight; campaigns call for Walters' removal
2024-03-22
In Oklahoma, Tulsa County District Attorney Stephen Kunzweiler announced that no charges will be filed in connection with the fight that happened the day before transgender, nonbinary high school student Nex Benedict died by suicide, NBC ...


Gay News

NATIONAL Va. marriage bill, AARP, online counseling, Idaho items, late activist
2024-03-21
Republican Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin signed bills protecting same-sex marriages at a state level, surprising some, WRIC reported. The bills—passed out of both chambers along mostly party lines—will require clerks ...


Gay News

WORLD Leaked messages, Panama action, author dies at 32, Japan court, out athletes
2024-03-15
Hundreds of messages from an internal chat board for an international group of transgender health professionals were leaked in a report and framed as revealing serious health risks associated with gender-affirming care, including cancer, according to ...


Gay News

NATIONAL Missouri measure, HIV/AIDS Awareness Day, judge, Texas schools
2024-03-15
In Missouri, a newly proposed law could charge teachers and counselors with a felony and require them to register as sex offenders if they're found guilty of supporting transgender students who are socially transitioning, CNN noted. ...


Gay News

College athletes sue NCAA over transgender policies
2024-03-15
Former Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines was among a group of college athletes who filed a lawsuit against the NCAA on March 14, accusing it of violating their Title IX rights by allowing trans swimmer Lia Thomas ...


Gay News

LGBTQ+ people attacked by mobs in Greece
2024-03-14
Just weeks after a landmark law granted same-sex couples in Greece the right to marry, nearly 200 people dressed in black chased a transgender couple through the town square in Thessaloniki, the country's "second city" and ...


Gay News

Florida settles 'Don't Say Gay' lawsuit
2024-03-11
On March 11, the state of Florida settled a multi-year lawsuit against the so-called "Don't Say Gay" law, which limits how LGBTQ+ topics can be discussed and presented in schools, The Hill reported. The settlement agreement ...


Gay News

"X" gender marker now available on Illinois driver's licenses and state ID cards
2024-03-11
After several years of preparation, the Illinois Secretary of State's office is has been making the X gender designation available for non-binary residents and others not utilizing the M or F designations, since the beginning of ...


Gay News

WORLD Israeli reservist, man detained, Ghana bill, medic denied honor
2024-03-08
Hanania Ben-Shimon—the gay Israel Defense Forces reservist who was wounded as he killed one of the terrorists in the attack at the A-Za'ayem checkpoint near Ma'ale Adumim recently—published a post in which he pleaded that his ...


Gay News

Court blocks Texas attorney general's demand for PFLAG data
2024-03-01
From a press release: AUSTIN, Texas—Travis County District Court Judge Maria Cantú Hexel on March 1 blocked the latest effort by the Texas Attorney General's Office to persecute Texas families with transgender youth, temporarily haltin ...


Gay News

WORLD Canadian politics, Australian murders, Finnish study, 'Anatomy'
2024-03-01
Canadian conservatives are divided over an anti-trans policy that Alberta Premier Danielle Smith handed down in her province, The Guardian reported. The policy includes a ban on hormonal treatment, puberty ...


Gay News

Appeals court allows Ind. ban on gender-affirming care for minors
2024-03-01
On Feb. 27, a federal appeals court in Chicago allowed Indiana's ban on gender-affirming care to go into effect, removing a temporary injunction that U.S. District Court Judge James Patrick Hanlon issued last year, ABC News ...


 


Copyright © 2024 Windy City Media Group. All rights reserved.
Reprint by permission only. PDFs for back issues are downloadable from
our online archives.

Return postage must accompany all manuscripts, drawings, and
photographs submitted if they are to be returned, and no
responsibility may be assumed for unsolicited materials.

All rights to letters, art and photos sent to Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago
Gay and Lesbian News and Feature Publication) will be treated
as unconditionally assigned for publication purposes and as such,
subject to editing and comment. The opinions expressed by the
columnists, cartoonists, letter writers, and commentators are
their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature Publication).

The appearance of a name, image or photo of a person or group in
Nightspots (Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times
(a Chicago Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature
Publication) does not indicate the sexual orientation of such
individuals or groups. While we encourage readers to support the
advertisers who make this newspaper possible, Nightspots (Chicago
GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay, Lesbian
News and Feature Publication) cannot accept responsibility for
any advertising claims or promotions.

 
 

TRENDINGBREAKINGPHOTOS






Donate


About WCMG      Contact Us      Online Front  Page      Windy City  Times      Nightspots
Identity      BLACKlines      En La Vida      Archives      Advanced Search     
Windy City Queercast      Queercast Archives     
Press  Releases      Join WCMG  Email List      Email Blast      Blogs     
Upcoming Events      Todays Events      Ongoing Events      Bar Guide      Community Groups      In Memoriam     
Privacy Policy     

Windy City Media Group publishes Windy City Times,
The Bi-Weekly Voice of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Trans Community.
5315 N. Clark St. #192, Chicago, IL 60640-2113 • PH (773) 871-7610 • FAX (773) 871-7609.