Windy City Media Group Frontpage News

THE VOICE OF CHICAGO'S GAY, LESBIAN, BI, TRANS AND QUEER COMMUNITY SINCE 1985

home search facebook twitter join
Gay News Sponsor Windy City Times 2021-12-08
DOWNLOAD ISSUE
Donate

Sponsor


  WINDY CITY TIMES

No-Trans ENDA Passes
by Lisa Keen
2007-11-14

This article shared 5685 times since Wed Nov 14, 2007
facebook twitter google +1 reddit email


In what could be argued was the most important gay vote ever taken in Congress, the U.S. House of Representatives voted 235 to 184 Nov. 7 to approve the Employment Non-Discrimination Act ( ENDA ) . Passage came after openly gay Rep. Barney Frank made an emotional plea to his colleagues.

'There are people who are your fellow citizens who are being discriminated against,' said Frank, his voice choking in a rare display of emotion. '….Please don't turn your back on them.'

The House erupted into applause.

Frank's appeal came after Republicans made an eleventh-hour attempt to kill the bill through a motion to send it back to committee. The specific type of 'motion to recommit' they sought—a motion to recommit promptly—would have held the bill in committee for nine calendar days. That, said Frank, would effectively kill the legislation for this session because Congress is scheduled to adjourn in five calendar days.

Frank, saying he was taking the vote 'personally,' pleaded with members of the House not to buy into what he called a political 'sham.'

His remarks also came just minutes after another emotional plea from the House's only other openly gay member, Rep. Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin. Baldwin had led efforts in recent weeks to have 'gender identity' added to the legislation. Backed by more than 300 LGBT groups, Baldwin had sought the amendment as a way to provide protection for transgender people and as a way to strengthen the bill's protections for gay people. ( Some believe that, without 'gender identity' in the legislation, an employer can discriminate against a person for having the appearance or mannerisms of a gender other than their own. )

On the floor of the House Tuesday, Baldwin said that while she believed there was 'strong support' in the House for adding gender identity to the bill, she also expected it would 'fall short of adoption.'

'I have been asked why I pressed for and insisted on this amendment,' said Baldwin. 'I believe those who will be left behind by this bill deserve to hear on this House floor that you are not forgotten and our job will not be finished until you, too, share fully in the American dream.'

Baldwin said she would withdraw the amendment, then, added that she was doing so 'with a commitment to my colleagues and all Americans committed to equality of opportunity and ending discrimination that I will do everything within my power to make this measure whole again.'

The House erupted in applause.

Although it was never formally debated, Baldwin's amendment had been the focus of much of the five hours of debate Wednesday, as Republicans cried foul over a Rules Committee stipulation that Baldwin could introduce her amendment and withdraw it without first getting unanimous consent to do so.

Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., said he was disappointed that the House was being denied the opportunity to have a 'full and fair debate' on the Baldwin Amendment. But Frank, ENDA's chief sponsor, came to the floor and teased Hastings for his 'eagerness' to discuss the plight of transgender people.

'I'm impressed by the sincerity of the gentleman from Washington on behalf of people who are transgender,' said Frank. He then chided Hastings for seeking to use debate on the amendment 'as a weapon with which to defeat the whole bill.'

After about an hour of discussion about the rules surrounding the Baldwin Amendment, Hastings made a motion to adjourn—a tactical move to buy time or to stall movement on a bill. That motion failed on a roll call vote of 164 to 254. Ultimately, the vote on whether to accept the rules governing consideration of the bill and its amendments was the closest vote of the day, with the rules being accepted on a 218 to 205 vote.

It was during debate on the rules that Republicans laid out their objections to ENDA, saying it would impinge upon the free exercise of religion, endanger the institution of marriage, and lead to endless litigation over such terms as 'perceived' sexual orientation.

ENDA prohibits discrimination in employment based on 'actual or perceived' sexual orientation. Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite, R-Fla., said she believed many Republicans, including herself, would support ENDA 'without the perception language in it.'

But most Republicans who spoke against the legislation claimed it would lead to situations in which Christian employees would be forbidden to have Bibles sitting on their desks. Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., minority whip, said that if an employee chose to keep a Bible at his work station and a co-worker could see it, the co-worker might 'bring suit against you saying that the mere presence of religious symbols constitutes a hostile work place.'

Those speaking for ENDA were mostly Democrats, although at least two Republicans spoke in favor of the legislation—Reps. Deborah Pryce of Ohio and Mark Steven Kirk of Illinois.

Among the more impassioned remarks in support of the legislation came from African-American members, who likened efforts to protect gays from discrimination to the civil rights movement in the 1960s.

James Clyburn of South Carolina invoked the memory of Blacks being refused service at lunch counters in the South, and John Lewis of Georgia recalled the signs that designated different entrances for 'Whites' and 'Coloreds.'

'I, for one, fought too long and too hard to end discrimination based on race and color not to stand up against discrimination against our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters,' said Lewis. 'During the 1960s, we broke down those signs that said 'White' and 'Colored.' Call it what you may: to discriminate against someone because they're gay is wrong….

'Today,' he said, 'we have an opportunity to bring down more signs. Now is the time to do what is right, what is fair, what is just. The time is always right to do right. Let us pass this bill.'

In passing the bill, the House approved two amendments. One was a preemptive strike in anticipation of opponents' chief objections. It came from House Education and Labor Committee Chair George Miller, D-Calif., and Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., and stipulated that the religious exemption allowed for in ENDA would be the same as the religious exemption allowed in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It also stipulated that ENDA 'does not alter the Defense of Marriage Act ( DOMA ) in any way.' It passed on a vote of 412 to 25.

The second amendment, from one of ENDA's chief detractors—Rep. Mark Souder, R-Ind.—struck a paragraph which sought to prohibit employers from conditioning employment on a person being married or being eligible to be married.' Chairman Miller said he would not oppose the amendment because he believed it did not diminish an employee's ability to convince a jury an employer had violated the law by requiring marriage as a pretense for discriminating based on sexual orientation. That amendment passed on a vote of 325 to 101.

When the third amendment, Baldwin's, came up, Souder again raised objections by Republicans that Baldwin was being given an unprecedented privilege to withdraw her amendment without the unanimous consent of the House. Souder said the rule was being used as a political ploy to avoid having an embarrassing vote on the amendment about 'people who dress up as the opposite sex.' Souder attempted to undermine the rule by suddenly calling for a roll call vote on the amendment in the seconds before Baldwin was given the opportunity to say she was withdrawing it. Parliamentary procedure gives precedence to the call for a recorded vote. But Souder was overruled and the House moved on to give Republicans a chance to recommit the bill, as House rules also require.

Rep. Randy Forbes, R-Va., led the recommitment effort, saying it was necessary to 'ensure this bill does not become the building block that some may want to use to destroy the institution of marriage.' His motion sought to send the bill back to committee to add language saying nothing in the bill could be construed as redefining marriage for federal or state purposes beyond the definition of 'one man and one woman.'

That's when Frank stepped up to the podium and asked Forbes if he would allow the House to proceed to vote if Democrats accepted his language by unanimous consent. Forbes balked.

Frank said Forbes' refusal to accept the offer was a clear indication that Republicans were simply seeking to send the bill back to committee with the 'unmistakable intent to put this off until we are due to adjourn.'

'We say here that we don't take things personally and, usually, that's true,' said Frank. 'But the members, Mr. Speaker, will have to forgive me if I take it a little personally.' Frank said that he had been working for passage of the legislation for 35 years and that, because he holds a position of power, he is no longer threatened by employment discrimination.

'But I feel an obligation,' said Frank, his voice choking up, 'to the 15-year-olds dreading to go to school because of the torments, or the person who loses their job at the gas station because of who they love… and so I ask my colleagues here on a personal basis: Don't fall for this sham.

'There are people who are your fellow citizens who are being discriminated against….Please don't turn your back on them.'

The House again erupted into sustained applause. And then it voted 198 to 222 to reject the motion to recommit.

The House then moved quickly to vote on the merits of the overall legislation. The final tally was handed to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who had herself spoke on behalf of the bill but had spent much of the session on the floor with her colleagues. With a big smile on her face, Pelosi announced the 235 to 184 tally, noting that the bill had passed. And the House again broke into sustained applause.

This is the first time the House had ever voted on the legislation to prohibit employment discrimination based on sexual orientation—legislation that was first introduced more than 30 years ago and which went through many permutations before reaching the floor tonight. It is the first time it had ever passed either chamber of Congress, but it was also a bittersweet victory because of the omission of gender identity.

'It was an historic first step toward a fully inclusive piece of legislation,' said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign. 'We're in a good place to build on this historic victory and move towards a more inclusive piece of legislation.'

Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, called passage of the bill without gender identity 'one step backwards but a bunch of steps forward.'

'We're disappointed,' she said, 'but we're very excited about the support that trans people had in the LGBT community and in Congress. We're just looking forward to passing the real ENDA in 2009.'

Many political observers expect that, even if the Senate should pass ENDA during the 2007-08 session of Congress, the White House has already made clear that President Bush will likely veto it.

But Speaker Pelosi, in her remarks on the floor in support of the legislation, said that, while she shares the disappointment of those who want to include protections for transgender people, she was supporting the bill's passage now 'to build momentum for it' in the near future.


This article shared 5685 times since Wed Nov 14, 2007
facebook twitter google +1 reddit email

  ARTICLES YOU MIGHT LIKE

Gay News

Lambda Legal issues assessment of Biden-Harris administration's work for LGBTQ+, HIV communities
2022-01-22
-- From a press release - Washington, D.C. — Lambda Legal released a new comprehensive report that assesses the Biden-Harris administration's first year with respect to its impact on the LGBTQ+ community and everyone living with HIV. While the report identifies significan ...


Gay News

HRC condemns NCAA for failure to protect LGBTQ+ athletes
2022-01-21
-- From a press release - WASHINGTON, D.C. — Late last night, the NCAA ratified (https://www.ncaa.org/news/2022/1/20/media-center-ncaa-members-approve-new-constitution.aspx) its new constitution, which does not include nondiscrimination policy language that had ...


Gay News

Abortion Rights Panel marks 49th anniversary with demand to defend historic Roe v Wade
2022-01-21
-- From a press release - CHICAGO — To commemorate the 49th anniversary of Roe v Wade, a diverse national panel of speakers will demand that the U.S. Supreme Court uphold Roe, defending 50 years of legal abortion, and that supporters mobilize ...


Gay News

Former pope faulted in report on sexual abuse in German diocese
2022-01-20
A long-awaited report on sexual abuse in Germany's Munich diocese faulted retired Pope Benedict XVI's handling of four cases when he was archbishop in the 1970s and 1980s, The Chicago Tribune reported. Westpfahl Spilker Wastl, the ...


Gay News

Planned Parenthood Illinois Action launches virtual Black Community Town Hall Series in February
2022-01-20
-- From a press release - CHICAGO - Planned Parenthood Illinois Action (PPIA) proudly announces a new Black Community Town Hall series in honor of Black History Month. The series of virtual discussions will tackle topics such as community wellness and care, ...


Gay News

'Jane's Army' to recruit, deploy pro-choice volunteers
2022-01-20
-- From a press release - Chicago, IL — Personal PAC, Men4Choice, and Future Voices Council have launched Jane's Army — a joint campaign to recruit activist volunteers to educate, motivate, and activate pro-choice voters ahead of the critical 2022 election. This ...


Gay News

Gilead: Patients received fake HIV drugs
2022-01-20
Gilead Sciences Inc said an unauthorized network of drug distributors and suppliers sold pharmacies more than $250 million of counterfeit versions of its HIV treatments over the last two years, endangering patients, Reuters reported. The drugmaker ...


Gay News

Human Rights Campaign Foundation releases new data on the LGBTQ+ wage gap
2022-01-19
-- From a press release - WASHINGTON — Today, the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, the educational arm of the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ+) civil rights organization, released ...


Gay News

Human Rights Campaign celebrates advances in LGBTQ+ policies one year into Biden-Harris administration
2022-01-19
-- From a press release - WASHINGTON, DC — One day before the one year anniversary of the inauguration of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) celebrates the advances that have been made in LGBTQ+ ...


Gay News

Chief Judge Evans responds to Mayor Lightfoot's request on electronic monitoring
2022-01-18
-- Press release from Office of the Chief Judge Cook County Circuit Court - Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans responded Jan. 19 to Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot's request for a moratorium on use of electronic monitoring for defendants accused of certain violent crimes by pointing out the national and state ...


Gay News

Texas' anti-trans youth sports law goes into effect
2022-01-18
A new Texas law bars transgender student athletes from competing on school sports teams that align with their gender identity, Houston Public Media reported. House Bill 25 is one of several laws that went into effect ...


Gay News

Passing the torch: How generations of trans women approach activism, advocacy
2022-01-18
As part of an older generation of transgender women in Chicago (including icon Gloria Allen), advocate Channyn Lynne Parker knows the work will outlast her. That's why she thinks of advocacy like a marathon, not a ...


Gay News

Rabbi taken hostage in Texas LGBTQ-friendly synagogue expresses thanks
2022-01-17
Rabbi Charlie Cytron-Walker, who was among the four hostages freed Jan. 15 from a Dallas-area synagogue, said there was "no question" the experience was traumatic, and thanked the community and world for the prayers and love, ...


Gay News

NATIONAL Lambda Legal, Penn. city's change, couple on the run, Bayard Rustin
2022-01-16
Lambda Legal filed a complaint with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against the Dallas Arboretum and Botanical Society, Inc. on behalf of a former employee who was fired after they and other Dallas Arboretum ...


Gay News

National LGBTQ Task Force Action Fund ED urges action on voting rights
2022-01-14
-- From a press release - "The National LGBTQ Task Force Action Fund urges the U.S. Senate to pass the Freedom to Vote Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. Voting rights are a cornerstone of our democratic process and ...


 



Copyright © 2022 Windy City Media Group. All rights reserved.
Reprint by permission only. PDFs for back issues are downloadable from
our online archives. Single copies of back issues in print form are
available for $4 per issue, older than one month for $6 if available,
by check to the mailing address listed below.

Return postage must accompany all manuscripts, drawings, and
photographs submitted if they are to be returned, and no
responsibility may be assumed for unsolicited materials.
All rights to letters, art and photos sent to Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago
Gay and Lesbian News and Feature Publication) will be treated
as unconditionally assigned for publication purposes and as such,
subject to editing and comment. The opinions expressed by the
columnists, cartoonists, letter writers, and commentators are
their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual and Transegender News and Feature Publication).

The appearance of a name, image or photo of a person or group in
Nightspots (Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times
(a Chicago Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature
Publication) does not indicate the sexual orientation of such
individuals or groups. While we encourage readers to support the
advertisers who make this newspaper possible, Nightspots (Chicago
GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay, Lesbian
News and Feature Publication) cannot accept responsibility for
any advertising claims or promotions.

 
 

TRENDINGBREAKINGPHOTOS






Donate


About WCMG      Contact Us      Online Front  Page      Windy City  Times      Nightspots      OUT! Guide     
Identity      BLACKlines      En La Vida      Archives      Advanced Search     
Windy City Queercast      Queercast Archives     
Press  Releases      Join WCMG  Email List      Email Blast      Blogs     
Upcoming Events      Todays Events      Ongoing Events      Bar Guide      Community Groups      In Memoriam      Outguide Categories      Outguide Advertisers      Search Outguide      Travel      Dining Out      Privacy Policy     

Windy City Media Group publishes Windy City Times,
The Bi-Weekly Voice of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Trans Community.
5315 N. Clark St. #192, Chicago, IL 60640-2113 • PH (773) 871-7610 • FAX (773) 871-7609.