Windy City Media Group Frontpage News
Celebrating 30 Years of Gay Lesbian Bisexual and Trans News
home search facebook twitter join
Gay News Sponsor Windy City Times 2020-09-16
DOWNLOAD ISSUE
About WCMG Publications News  Entertainment Features Donate Bars & Clubs Calendar Advertisers OUT! Guide    Marriage

Sponsor

  WINDY CITY TIMES

ANALYSIS: Md. Court Upholds Same-Sex Marriage Ban
by Lisa Keen
2007-09-26

facebook twitter google +1 reddit email


The supreme court of Maryland, on Sept. 18, reversed a lower court decision which had found a constitutional right for gay couples to marry. The decision made Maryland the fifth state high court in less than two years to uphold as legal the withholding of marriage licenses from same-sex couples.

Gay legal activist Evan Wolfson, head of the national Freedom to Marry group, called the decision 'deeply flawed' and said the 4 to 3 majority never even tried to answer the key question of how excluding gay couples affects the ability of heterosexual couples to procreate.

The Maryland lawsuit Conaway v. Deane challenged the state's marriage law that, in 1973, defined marriage as being only between a man and a woman. The ACLU, which led the challenge, argued that the restriction amounted to sex discrimination against gay people.

But the majority of the court upheld the law as written and concluded that, because gay people have never been legally designated as a 'suspect class'—a legal designation for an oppressed minority—the government did not need to show any compelling reason for denying them equal treatment under the law. Instead, said the majority, all the government need show was a simple rational reason—the lowest level of review for the statute.

And the government's simple rational reason—that licenses to heterosexual couples foster procreation and encourage the traditional family structure—is plausible, said the majority.

Gay civil rights supporters were dismayed.

Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese called the decision a 'setback.' National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Executive Director Matt Foreman called it 'demeaning.'

'Today is a sad day for all Maryland families,' said Jennifer Chrisler, executive director of Family Pride, a national organization that advocates on behalf of LGBT families. But she and others vowed not to give up.

'The struggle for marriage equality is far from over,' said Chrisler.

Equality Maryland's Dan Furmansky vowed to continue the fight and called on the state legislature to rewrite the law. That same day, Democratic State Senator Gwen Britt announced she would introduce legislation next year to allow same-sex couples to marry, assuring the fight would now move to the state legislature, which has approved a state law barring discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Ken Choe, the ACLU attorney who argued on behalf of the gay couples, expressed hope that, unlike the majority of the bench, the legislature would be able to see 'that lesbian and gay couples form committed relationships and loving families just like heterosexual couples.'

The Maryland Court of Appeals majority decision essentially parroted the harsher of two models for state supreme court decisions that have rejected equal rights for gay couples since 1999. That harsher model—carved out by the supreme court of New York in July of last year—finds nothing in the state constitution to require equal treatment of same-sex couples when it comes to marriage licensing. And it uses the lowest level of legal review to determine whether the state has a legitimate reason to treat gay couples differently. That level of review requires only that the government's reason be 'rational.'

In New York's case, the court accepted as rational the state's claim that the marriage law was intended to provide a special 'inducement' for heterosexuals to marry. That model was essentially adopted by the Washington Supreme Court later in 2006 when it said 'the legislature was entitled to believe that limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples furthers procreation … and furthers the well-being of children by encouraging families where children are reared in homes headed by the children's biological parents.' Maryland argued that the purpose of the state's marriage law was 'fostering procreation and encouraging the traditional family structure.'

The second model—initiated by the Vermont Supreme Court in 1999— finds that the state's constitution requires gay couples be treated equally but passes the buck to the legislature to determine how that will happen. New Jersey adopted that approach in October of last year with its ruling in Lewis v. Harris. Both Vermont and New Jersey legislatures chose 'civil unions' as the means of providing 'equal' benefits.

Last year, other state supreme courts—in Tennessee and Georgia—allowed ballot measures seeking to ban gay marriage to proceed.

Only one state supreme court—the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, in November 2003—has declared that a state's constitutional promise of equal protection of the law requires the state to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples the same as it does to heterosexual couples. The Hawaii Supreme Court ruled that denying same-sex couples marriage licenses was sex discrimination but the legislature passed a constitutional amendment to redefine marriage, thus taking the matter away from the court.

The first ever state supreme court ruling concerning same-sex marriage came in 1971 when the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that the state could deny a marriage license to a same-sex couple. That lawsuit, Baker v. Nelson, was dismissed by the U.S. Supreme Court with no explanation beyond 'want of a substantial federal question.' In what might also be considered a piece of the silver lining in the ruling, the majority rejected the notion that the Baker dismissal required it to reject plaintiffs' case out of hand.

A decision on a similar case is now pending in the Connecticut Supreme Court and will be argued soon in the California Supreme Court.


facebook twitter google +1 reddit email




Windy City Media Group does not approve or necessarily agree with the views posted below.
Please do not post letters to the editor here. Please also be civil in your dialogue.
If you need to be mean, just know that the longer you stay on this page, the more you help us.


  ARTICLES YOU MIGHT LIKE

WORLD Vancouver protest, dating apps, Budapest Pride, N. Ireland marriages 2020-09-08
Trans judicial candidate Jill Rose Quinn weds 2020-09-01
NATIONAL Bakery situation, tribal marriage, anti-LGBTQ crimes, Penn. lawmakers 2020-08-10
WORLD Israel incident, Cayman marriage, singer comes out, Poland arrests 2020-08-10
Ken Ilio, one of the first gay men to marry in Illinois, dies at 63 2020-08-02
NATIONAL Marriage video, non-binary person killed, memo, Buttigieg, Fauci 2020-07-13
Chicago church that hosted historic same-sex event demolished 2020-07-08
Consulates holding Pride talk June 30 2020-06-28
NCLR celebrates five-year anniversary of Supreme Court ruling on marriage equality 2020-06-26
Study says LGBT emotional well-being improved post marriage equality ruling 2020-06-10
WORLD Zambia pardon, fashion house, HIV+ mayor, Costa Rica marriage 2020-06-01
Report: Same-sex weddings boost state economies $3.8 B since marriage equality ruling 2020-05-29
Costa Rica celebrates marriage equality 2020-05-25
VIEWS LGBTQ discrimination is a disgrace 2020-05-18
Yarbrough officiates special Valentine's Day wedding 2020-02-18
WORLD Marriage in Mexico, European report, arrests in journalist's murder 2020-02-18
Talks on Feb. 16, March 1 about issues in 'The Cake' 2020-02-11
WORLD Swiss vote, Northern Ireland wedding, Tanzania report, bishops convene 2020-02-11
Judge rules for same-sex partners in Social Security case 2020-01-31
Federal court ruling benefits same-sex couples 2020-01-22
Indiana same-sex parents can list both names on children's birth certificates 2020-01-19
2019 global roundup, from Toronto to Taiwan 2020-01-08
NATIONAL Anti-LGBTQ crimes, Richard Grenell, two-spirit marriage, Adam Rippon 2020-01-07
UMC may split over same-sex marriage, inclusion 2020-01-04
WORLD Marriage status in Cuba, Shigella outbreak, anti-LGBTQ crime 2019-12-30
Memoir profiles lesser-known sides of Edie Windsor 2019-12-11
WORLD Marriages in Brazil, chemsex, couple attacked, Gus Kenworthy 2019-12-10
Cook County Clerk's office celebrates marriage equality milestones 2019-11-20
Same-sex marriage overturned in Caymans 2019-11-08
ACE Comic Con has same-sex marriage proposal 2019-10-29
WORLD Marriage news, Oscar Wilde, Ugandan activist dies, Iris Prize 2019-10-22
NATIONAL Marriage advocate divorcing, Black gay couple, trans death 2019-10-08
Kol Hadash Congregation embraces LGBTQ inclusivity 2019-10-02
WORLD Japanese case, Jamaica event canceled, Putin's law 2019-09-24
WORLD Gay leaders, Mexican trans women, Czech marriage bill 2019-09-17
Arizona Supreme Court grants Phoenix stationary shop license to discriminate 2019-09-16
Same-sex couple sues State Dept. for treating daughter as born out of wedlock 2019-09-12
WORLD Bermuda Pride, Russian bakery, marriage in Oaxaca 2019-09-03
WORLD South African judge, China on marriage, teens plead not guilty 2019-08-27
NATIONAL Trans death, ACA, 1957 gay wedding, serial killer 2019-08-21
 



Copyright © 2020 Windy City Media Group. All rights reserved.
Reprint by permission only. PDFs for back issues are downloadable from
our online archives. Single copies of back issues in print form are
available for $4 per issue, older than one month for $6 if available,
by check to the mailing address listed below.

Return postage must accompany all manuscripts, drawings, and
photographs submitted if they are to be returned, and no
responsibility may be assumed for unsolicited materials.
All rights to letters, art and photos sent to Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago
Gay and Lesbian News and Feature Publication) will be treated
as unconditionally assigned for publication purposes and as such,
subject to editing and comment. The opinions expressed by the
columnists, cartoonists, letter writers, and commentators are
their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual and Transegender News and Feature Publication).

The appearance of a name, image or photo of a person or group in
Nightspots (Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times
(a Chicago Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature
Publication) does not indicate the sexual orientation of such
individuals or groups. While we encourage readers to support the
advertisers who make this newspaper possible, Nightspots (Chicago
GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay, Lesbian
News and Feature Publication) cannot accept responsibility for
any advertising claims or promotions.

 

 

 

TRENDINGBREAKINGPHOTOS

Sponsor
Sponsor


 



About WCMG Publications News  Entertainment Features Donate Bars & Clubs Calendar Advertisers OUT! Guide    Marriage


About WCMG      Contact Us      Online Front  Page      Windy City  Times      Nightspots      OUT! Guide     
Identity      BLACKlines      En La Vida      Archives      Subscriptions      Distribution      Windy City Queercast     
Queercast Archives      Advertising  Rates      Deadlines      Advanced Search     
Press  Releases      Event Photos      Join WCMG  Email List      Email Blast     
Upcoming Events      Todays Events      Ongoing Events      Submit an Event      Bar Guide      Community Groups      In Memoriam      Outguide Categories      Outguide Advertisers      Search Outguide      Travel      Dining Out      Blogs      Spotlight  Video     
Classifieds      Real Estate      Place a  Classified     

Windy City Media Group publishes Windy City Times,
The Bi-Weekly Voice of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Trans Community.
5315 N. Clark St. #192, Chicago, IL 60640-2113 • PH (773) 871-7610 • FAX (773) 871-7609.